1. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University" (430005, Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russia)

Keywords:Mechanical jaundice, endogenous intoxication, ozone

Abstract:Purpose of the study. To assess the severity of endogenous intoxication in mechanical jaundice and to study the detoxification effect of the ozonized saline solution. Materials and methods. There were studied the results of surgical treatment of 76 patients with mechanical jaundice, divided into 2 groups. Patients in the group 1 (n = 40) underwent conventional treatment. 36 patients of the 2nd group were treated with ozonized saline solution. The following were determined: aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), alanine aminotransferase (ALAT); common and direct bilirubin, average weight molecules (AMM), malonicdialdehyde (MDA), catalase, creatinine and urea concentration in plasma. Results. On the 15th day of the postoperative period, the levels of ALAT, AMM, MDA, creatinine, urea were decreased in patients of group 1 by 33, 36, 38, 30 and 38% respectively, the level of catalase increased by 32%. In patients of the 2nd group, the levels of ALAT, AMM, MDA, creatinine and urea decreased by 59, 56, 61, 35, 55%, whereas the catalase level increased by 65%. The conclusion. The therapy with ozonized saline solution promotes the decrease of the level of endogenous intoxication due to more pronounced activation of antioxidant system with a decrease of the level of free radical oxidation and of destructive processes in the liver.

• References total 18 ⇓ :: .
  1. Starosek V.N., Khil'ko S.S., Vlakhov A.K. et al. Modern tendencies in surgical treatment of patients with obturation jaundice complicated by hepatic insufficiency // Klincheskaya Khirurgiya. — 2009. — Vol. 4. — P. 15–18.
  2. Assimakopoulos S.F. Scopa C.D., Zervoudakis G. et al. Bombesin and neurotensin reduce endotoxemia, intestinal oxidative stress, and apoptosis in experimental obstructive jaundice // Ann Surg. — 2005. — Vol. 241(1). — Р. 159–167.
  3. Grintzalis K., Papapostolou I., Assimakopoulos S.F. et al. Time-related alterations of superoxide radical levels in diverse organs of bile ductligated rats // Free Radical Research. — 2009. — Vol. 43(9). — P. 803–808.
  4. Porta F., Bracht H., Weikert C. et al. Effects of prolonged endotoxemia on liver, skeletal muscle and kidney mitochondrial function // Crit Care. — 2006. — Vol. 10(4). — P. 118.
  5. Howard T.J., Yu J., Greene R.B. et al. Influence of bactibilia after preoperative biliary stenting on postoperative infectious complications // J Gastrointest Surg. — 2006. — Vol. 10(4). — P. 523–531.
  6. Laschke M.W., Menger M.D., Wang Y. et al. Sepsisassociated cholestasis is critically dependent on Pselectin-dependent leukocyte recruitment in mice // Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. — 2007. — Vol. 292(5). — P. G1396–G1402.
  7. Assimakopoulos S.F., Scopa C.D., Vagianos C.T. Pathophysiology of increased intestinal permeability in obstructive jaundice // World J. Gastroenterol. — 2007. — Vol. 13(48). — P. 6458–6464.
  8. Belyaev A.N., Belyaev S.A., Kostin S.V. et al. Pathogenetic correction of the hemostasis disorders at the acute obstructive cholestasis. Medicinskij al'manah. 2010, no. 1, pp. 136–140.
  9. Ogetman Z., Dirlik M., Caglikulekci M. et al. The effect of aminoguanidine on blood and tissue lipid peroxidation in jaundiced rats with endotoxemia induced with LPS // J Invest Surg. — 2006. — Vol. 19(1). — P. 19–30.
  10. Assimakopoulos S.F., Vagianos C.E., Patsoukis N. et al. Evidence for intestinal oxidative stress in obstructive jaundice-induced gut barrier dysfunction in rats // Acta Physiol Scand. — 2004. — Vol. 180(2). — P. 177–185.
  11. Comert M., Karaelmas Z., Tekin I.O. et al. Obstructive jaundice leads to accumulation of oxidized low density lipoprotein in human liver tissue // World J Gastroenterol. — 2006. — Vol. 12(31). — P. 5094–5095.
  12. Matuschak G.M., Lechner A.J., Chen Z. et al. Hypoxic suppression of E. coli-induced NF-kappa B and AP-1 transactivation by oxyradical signaling //Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. — 2004. — Vol. 287(2). — P. 437–445.
  13. Zakhvatov A.N., Kuznetsov S.I., Safonov V. Yu. et al. Issledovanie khemilyuminestsentsii produktov perekisnogo okisleniya lipidov pri posttravmaticheskom artrite v eksperimente. HEALTH & EDUCATION MILLEMMIUM. 2014, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 5–7.
  14. Minaeva O.V., Brodovskaya E.P., Pyataev M.A. et al. Comparative study of cytotoxicity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles and magnetite containing polyelectrolyte microcapsules / O.V. Minaeva, E.P. Brodovskaya, M.A. Pyataev, M.V. Gerasimov, M.N. Zharkov, I.A. Yurlov, O.A. Kulikov, L.A. Balykova, N.A. Pyataev, A.A. Kotlyarov, A.V. Kokorev, A.V Zaborovskiy., G.B. Sukhorukov // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. — 2017. — Vol. 784. — № 1. — P. 012038.
  15. Konopeltsev I.G., Troegubov D.A., Platonov V.A. Antimikrobnye svoystva novoy ozonirovannoy emulsii [Antimicrobial properties of new ozonated emulsion]. Nizhegorodskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal — Nizhny Novgorod Medical Journal. 2005, pp. 238–239.
  16. Yanchenko O.S., Kontorshchikova Ye.Yu., Kryzhanova M.A. et al. Izmeneniya immunologicheskogo statusa u onkoginekologicheskikh bolnykh pod vliyaniem ozonirovannogo fiziologicheskogo rastvora [Changes in the immunological status of oncologic patients under the influence of ozonized saline]. Nizhegorodskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal — Nizhny Novgorod Medical Journal. 2005, pp. 115–116.
  17. Krylov V.N., Deryugina A.V., Simutis I.S. et al. Contents of ATP and 2,3-DPG in erythrocytes for preservation and ozone exposure Biomedicine. 2014, no. 2, pp. 37–42.
  18. Simutis I.S., Boyarinov G.A., Mukhin A.S. et al. Effektivnost ozonirovaniya eritrotsitarnoy massy v transfuzionnoy terapii gemorragicheskogo shoka [Efficiency of erythrocyte mass ozonization in transfusion therapy of hemorrhagic shock]. Bioradicals and Antioxidants. 2017, Vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 21–26.

Full text is published :
Belyaev A.N., Belyaev S.A., Kostin S.V., Tyurina N.A., Boyarkin E.V. Endogenous intoxication in mechanical joundice and the possibility of its pathogenetic correction. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;157(9): 101–106. DOI: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-157-9-101-106.
Read & Download full text

1. Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovsky (410012, Saratov, Russia)

Keywords: pancreonecrosis, purulent-necrotic parapancreatitis, necrosectomy

Abstract:Objective: to determine the prognostic value of the complex assessment of the patient's condition (clinical examination using scales, biochemical markers, dynamic ultrasound and CT) for the timely formulation of indications for surgery in the development of purulent complications of pancreatonecrosis in the phase of septic sequestration. Material and Methods: the study included 186 patients with pancreatic necrosis. The comparison group included patients whose manifestations of the disease were limited to the development of enzymatic peritonitis. The second group includes patients who have formed peripancreatic infiltrate and (or) isolated pancreatogenic abscess. The third group consisted of patients with purulent-necrotic parapancreatitis. Results: Measurements on the SAPS III scale revealed a significant difference of scores in patients with purulent necrotic parapancreatitis and patients in the comparison group. Similar data were obtained from a comparative assessment of the severity of organ failure on the SOFA scale. The study showed a significant decrease in the serum albumin level in patients with purulent-necrotic parapancreatitis and the presence of a significant difference in this parameter with patients in the comparison group. Conclusion: With purulent-necrotic parapancreatitis, a complex assessment of the patient's condition helps timely recognize infectious complications and formulate the indications for surgical intervention. In patients with limited infected pancreatic necrosis, the use of scales and biochemical markers was not very informative.

• References total 29 ⇓ :: .
  1. Pugaev A.V., Achkasov E.E. Ostryj pankreatit [Acute pancreatitis]. Moscow, Profil' Publ., 2007, 336 p. [In Russian].
  2. Banks P.A, Freeman M.L. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology; practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 379–400.
  3. Briskin B.S., Halidov O.H. Hirurgicheskoe lechenie pankreonekroza [Surgical treatment of pancreatic necrosis]. Neotlozhnaya i specializirovannaya hirurgicheskaya pomoshch': Pervyj kongress moskovskih hirurgov [Emergency and Specialized Surgical Assistance: First Congress of Moscow Surgeons]. Moscow, GEOS, 2005, 88p. [In Russian].
  4. Savel'ev V.S., Filimonov M.I., Gel'fand B.R., et al. Pankreonekroz: aktual'nye voprosy klassifikacii, diagnostiki i lecheniya (rezul'taty anketirovaniya hirurgicheskih klinik Rossijskoj Federacii) [Pancreatonecrosis: current issues of classification, diagnosis and treatment (results of a survey of surgical clinics of the Russian Federation)]. Consilium medicum 2000; (7): 367-373. [In Russian].
  5. Uhi W., Warshaw A., Imrie C. et al. IAP Guidelines for the surgical management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2002; (2): 565-573.
  6. Santvoort H.C., Bakker O.J., Bollen T.L., et al. A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1254–1263. doi: 10.1053/j. gastro.2011.06.073
  7. Gotzinger P., Sautner T., Kriwanek S. et al. Surgical treatment for severe acute pancreatitis: extent and surgical control of necrosis determine outcome. World J. Surg 2002; 26: 474–478.
  8. Shapkin Y.G., Berezkina S.Y. Rannyaya diagnostika, prognoz i hirurgicheskaya taktika pri ostrom pankreatite [Early diagnosis, prognosis and surgical tactics in acute pancreatitis]. Saratov, Sarat Publ., 2008, 164 p. [In Russian].
  9. Freeman M.L., Werner J., Santvoort H.C. et al. Interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: summary of a multidisciplinary consensus conference. Pancreas 2012; 41: 1176–1194. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318269c660.
  10. Doctor N., Agarwal P., Gandhi V. Management of severe acute pancreatitis. Indian J. Surg 2012; 74: 40-46. doi: 10.1007/s12262-011-0384-5.
  11. Brunschot S., Bakker O.J., Besselink M.G. et al. Treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol 2012; 10: 1190–1201. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.05.005.
  12. Filimonov M.I., Gel'fand B.R., Burnevich S.Z. Ostryj pankreatit: posobie dlya vrachej [Acute pancreatitis: a guide for doctors]. Moscow, NTSSSH them A.N. Bakulev RAMS Publ., 2000, 59 p. [In Russian].
  13. Savel'ev V.C ., Filimonov M.I., Burnevich S.Z. Pankreonekrozy. Moscow, LLC "Medical Information Agency" Publ., 2008, 264 p. [In Russian].
  14. Ostryj pankreatit [Acute pancreatitis]. Sbornik metodicheskih materialov shkoly hirurgii ROH [The collection of methodological materials of the School of Surgery POH.]. 2015, 94 p. [In Russian].
  15. Babu BI, Sheen AJ, Siriwardena AK. Outcome of open necrosectomy in the era of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery. Pancreas 2008; 37: 460. doi:10.1097/01. MPA.0000335481.54227.51.
  16. Demin D.B., Tarasenko V.S. Minimally invasive surgery of pancreonecrosis: progress and problems. Vestnik chirurgii named after I.I. Grekov. 2009; (5): 55–58.
  17. Briskin B.S., Halidov O.H., Shebzuhov A.E. Evolution of views of surgical treatment of acute destructive pancreatitis. Vestnik chirurgii named after I.I. Grekov. 2008; (6): 105–109.
  18. Babu B.I., Sheen A.J. Open Pancreatic Necrosectomy in the Multidisciplinary Management of Postinflammatory Necrosis. Annals of Surgery 2010; 251 (5): 783-786. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b59303.
  19. Imrie C.W. Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis. Can. J. Gastroenterol 2003; 17(4): 325–328. doi: 10.1155/2003/250815.
  20. Shapkin Y.G., Khilgiyaev R.H., Mihailenko K.A. Probability of developing severe sepsis in patients of elderly and senile age with necrotic erysipelas. Saratov J Med Sci Res 2015; 11(2): 198–201.
  21. Rau B., Steinbach G., Baumgart K. et al. Serum amyloid A versus C-reactive protein in acute pancreatitis: clinical value of an alternative acute-phase reactant. Crit. Care Med 2000; 28 (3): 736–742.
  22. Savel'ev V.S., Gel'fand B.R., Filimonov M.I. The role of procalcitonin test in the diagnosis and evaluation of the severity of infected forms of pancreatic necrosis. Annali chirurgii 2001; (4): 44–49.
  23. Gel'fand B.R., Filimonov M.I., Brazhnik T.B. Procalcitonin: a new laboratory diagnostic marker of sepsis and purulent-septic complications in surgery. Vestnik intensivnoj terapii 2003; (1): 13–18.
  24. Tenner S.M. , Feng S. , Noerdook S. e t al. The relationship of organ failure to pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterology 1997; 113 (2): 899–903.
  25. Buchler M.W., Gloor B., Musller C.A. et al. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: treatment strategy according to the status of infection. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 619–626.
  26. Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2013; (4):15.
  27. Rau B., Pralle U., Mayer J.M. et al. Role of ultrasonographically guided fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of infected pancreatic necrosis. Br. J. Surg 1998; 85 (4):179–184.
  28. Rodriguez J.R., Razo A.O., Targarona J. et al. Debridement and closed packing for sterile or infected necrotizing pancreatitis: insights into indications and outcomes in 167 patients. Ann. Surg 2008; 247 (5): 294-299. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815b6976.
  29. Pappas T. Is CT guided fine needle aspiration helpful in patients with infected necrosis. Am. J. Gastroenterol 2005; 100(7): 2371–2374.

Full text is published :
Shapkin Yu.G., Khilgiyaev R.Kh., Scripal E.A. Indications to surgical treatment in patients with infected pancreonecrosis. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;157(9): 107–114. DOI: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-157-9-107-114.
Read & Download full text

1. Ryazan State Medical University (390026, Ryazan, Russia)

Keywords: chronic pancreatitis, quality of life, malabsorption syndrome

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to study the quality of life of patients with chronic pancreatitis. An original questionnaire on the quality of life of patients with chronic pancreatitis was proposed and tested. Materials and methods: 38 operated and 40 non-operated patients with chronic pancreatitis were examined. Results. A high degree of conceptual, constructive and criterial validity, internal consistency and reproducibility of the original questionnaire scales is proved. A strong correlation was found between rs> 0,71 of the scale of digestive disorders with the severity of malabsorption syndrome (p <0.001). The proposed COLPAC questionnaire can be used for diagnostic purposes and for an individual assessment of the clinical symptoms of chronic pancreatitis. The questionnaire can serve as a reliable tool for assessing the quality of life of patients operated on for chronic pancreatitis.

• References total 16 ⇓ :: .
  1. Tarasenko S.V., Bogomolov A.YU., Zaytsev O.V., Peskov O.D., Natal'skiy A.A. ERAS — sovremennaya kontseptsiya vedeniya khirurgicheskikh bol'nykh. Sobstvennyy opyt [ERAS is a modern concept for the management of surgical patients. Own experience]. Nauka molodykh — Eruditio juvenium. 2016, no. 1, pp. 67–71.
  2. Brimkulov N.N., Senkevich N.YU., Kaliyeva A.D. Primeneniye oprosnika SF-36 dlya otsenki kachestva zhizni [Application of the SF-36 questionnaire to assess the quality of life]. Tsentral'noaziatskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal — Central Asian Medical Journal. 1998, no. 4–5, pp. 236–241.
  3. Aaronson N.К. Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: methodologicalissues. // Control Clin Trials. — 1989. — Vol. 10. — P. 195–208.
  4. Aaronson N.K., Cull A., Kaasa S., Sprangers M. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology. // Int J Ment Health. — 1994. — Vol. 23. — P. 75–96.
  5. Bowling A. Measuring Disease: a review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales. — Buckingham: Open University Press, 1996. — 208 p.
  6. Kotov M.S., Podoluzhnyy V.I. Otsenka kachestva zhizni patsiyentov, svyazannogo so zdorov'yem [Evaluation of the quality of life of patients associated with health]. Meditsina Kuzbassa. — 2007. — № 3. — S.15–18.
  7. Novik A.A., Ionova T.I. Rukovodstvo po issledovaniyu kachestva zhizni v meditsine [Guidance on the study of the quality of life in medicine]. Moscow, OLMA Media Grupp Publ., 2007, 320 p.
  8. Dobrovol'skiy S.P., Abdurakhmanov Yu.H., Dzhamynchiyev E.K., Abdullayeva A.A. Study of the quality of life of patients in surgery. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2008, no. 12, pp. 73–76.
  9. Fitzsimmons D, Johnson CD, George S, et al. Development of a disease specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire module to supplement the EORTC core cancer QoL questionnaire, the QLQ-C30 in patients with pancreatic cancer. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life.// Eur J Cancer. — 1999 Jun;35(6):939–41.
  10. Vanagas T. et al. Translation and validation of the EORTC QLQ-PAN26 quality of life questionnaire for patients with pancreatic cancer //Acta Medica Lituanica. — 2006. — Т. 13. — № 4.
  11. Eaton A. A. et al. Psychometric Validation of the EORTC QLQ-PAN26 Pancreatic Cancer Module for Assessing Health Related Quality of Life after Pancreatic Resection // JOP. Journal of the Pancreas. — 2017.
  12. Steshenko A. A. Otsenka kachestva zhizni s ispol'zovaniyem oprosnikov EORTC Qlq C30, EORTC Qlq pan28 u bol'nykh khronicheskim pankreatitom posle khirurgicheskogo lecheniya [Evaluation of the quality of life using the EORTC Qlq C30, EORTC Qlq pan28 questionnaires in patients with chronic pancreatitis after surgical treatment]. Aktual'ní problemi suchasnoї meditsini: Vísnik ukraїns'koї medichnoї stomatologíchnoї akademíї — Actual problems of medical medicine: News of Ukrainian Dental Medicine Academy. 2013, no.4 (44), pp. 58–63.
  13. Tarasenko S.V., Rakhmayev T.S., Peskov O.D., Kopeykin A.A., et al. Klassifikatsionnyye kriterii khronicheskogo pankreatita [Classification criteria for chronic pancreatitis]. Ros. med.-biol. vestn. im. akad. I.P. Pavlova. 2016, no.1, pp. 91–97.
  14. Revel'-muroz ZH. A. Quality of life in patients with chronic fibrosing pancreatitis who underwent laser tunneling of the pancreas. Human. Sport. Medicine. 2011;39 (256):90–93.
  15. Kudryashova I.V. Rannyaya diagnostika khronicheskogo pankreatita s pozitsii ispol'zovaniya ul'trazvukovoy tomografii i indeksa kachestva zhizni [Early diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis from the perspective of using ultrasound tomography and the quality of life index]. Smolensk, 2003, 20 s.
  16. Kozlov I.A., Vishnevskiy V.A., Chzhao A.V., Baydarova M.D. Choosing a method of surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis. PM. 2017;6 (107):32–40.

Full text is published :
Natalskiy A.A., Tarasenko S.V., Zaytsev O.V., Bogomolov A.Yu., Peskov О.D., Kadykova O.A. quality of life in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;157(9): 115–120. DOI: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-157-9-115-120.
Read & Download full text

1. Federal State Budgetary Institution «N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology» оf the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (115478, Moscow, Russia)
2. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education "Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (125993, Moscow, Russia)

Keywords: endoscopic ultrasonography, fine needle puncture efficiency, morphological verification, adrenal gland

Abstract: Fine needle puncture under the control of endoscopic ultrasonography is a high-tech method of morphological verification of the diagnosis. This article is devoted to the review and analysis of the possibilities of fine needle puncture under the control of endosonography in the morphological verification of pathologically altered adrenal glands. The aim of the study was to explore the possibilities of fine-needle puncture under the control of the endoscopic ultrasonography in the morphological verification of space-occupying lesions of the adrenal gland. Materials and methods: the study included 59 patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasonography in the period from 2007 to 2018, 39 of them underwent fine needle puncture for morphological verification of the diagnosis. Results: to solve the tasks — morphological verification of the diagnosis in 39 patients 45 fine — needle punctures were performed, 34 (75.6%) of them were performed once, in 4 (8.8%) cases it was performed twice, in 1 (2.2%) — three times. Of the 44 performed fine-needle punctures in 4 (9.1%), its results were uninformative. The informativeness of EUS-TYPE for morphological verification was 90.9%. Complications of various kinds were not recorded Conclusion: thus, endoscopic ultrasonography in our study has demonstrated itself as a high-precision method of examination of patients, allowing to visually identify and confirm tumor changes in the adrenal glands. Taking into account the resolution of this method and the proximity of the adrenal gland to the echoendoscope sensor, performing a fineneedle puncture is the best way to obtain material for morphological verification of the diagnosis. The combination of the advantages of the method in the possibility of visualization and the minimum distance to the object of fine-needle puncture allow us to recommend this method as the main if necessary morphological verification of changes in the adrenal glands.

• References total 19 ⇓ :: .
  1. DeWitt JM. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of right adrenal masses: report of 2 cases. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:261–267.
  2. Tsitouridis I, Michaelides M, Stratilati S, Sidiropoulos D, Bintoudi A, Rodokalakis G. CT guided percutaneous adrenal biopsy for lesions with equivocal findings in chemical shift MR imaging. Hippokratia. 2008;12:37–42.
  3. Lee MJ, Hahn PF, Papanicolaou N, et al. Benign and malignant adrenal masses:CT distinction with attenuation coefficients, size, and observer analysis. Radiology. 1991;179:415–418.
  4. Bodtger U, Vilmann P, Clementsen P, et al. Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration of left adrenal masses in established or suspected lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:1485–1489.
  5. Pantalone KM, Gopan T, Remer EM, et al. Change in adrenal mass size as a predictor of a malignant tumor. Endocr Pract. 2010;16:577–587.
  6. Sharma KV, Venkatesan AM, Swerdlow D, et al. Imageguided adrenal and renal biopsy. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;13:100–109.
  7. Schuurbiers OC, Tournoy KG, Schoppers HJ, Dijkman BG, Timmers HJ, de Geus-Oei LF, Grefte JM, Rabe KF, Dekhuijzen PN, van der Heijden HF, et al. EUS-FNA for the detection of left adrenal metastasis in patients with lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2011;73:310–315.
  8. Zeiger MA, Thompson GB, Duh QY, Hamrahian AH, Angelos P, Elaraj D, Fishman E, Kharlip J. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Association of Endocrine Surgeons medical guidelines for the management of adrenal incidentalomas. Endocr Pract. 2009;15 Suppl 1:1–20.
  9. Dietrich CF, Wehrmann T, Hoffmann C, Herrmann G, Caspary WF, Seifert H. Detection of the adrenal glands by endoscopic or transabdominal ultrasound. Endoscopy. 1997;29:859–864.
  10. Lumachi F, Borsato S, Brandes AA, Boccagni P, Tregnaghi A, Angelini F, Favia G. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of adrenal masses in noncancer patients: clinicoradiologic and histologic correlations in functioning and nonfunctioning tumors. Cancer. 2001;93:323–329.
  11. Tsitouridis I, Michaelides M, Stratilati S, Sidiropoulos D, Bintoudi A, Rodokalakis G. CT guided percutaneous adrenal biopsy for lesions with equivocal findings in chemical shift MR imaging. Hippokratia. 2008;12:37–42.
  12. Puchkov K.V., Evstratov R.M. Fine needle biopsy of the adrenal tumors. Moscow surgical journal. 2017; 4(56): 38–42.
  13. Burdyukov M.S. Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii po vypolneniyu endoskopicheskoy ul'trasonografii iz prosveta verkhnikh otdelov zheludochno-kishechnogo trakta v rezhime konveksnogo skanirovaniya i tonkoigol'noy punktsii pod yeye kontrolem [Guidelines for the implementation of endoscopic ultrasonography from the lumen of the upper gastrointestinal tract in the mode of convex scanning and fine needle puncture under its control]. 2012; 4(36):2–27.
  14. Uemura S, Yasuda I, Kato T, et al. Preoperative routine evaluation of bilateral adrenal glands by endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration in patients with potentially resectable lung cancer. Endoscopy. 2013;45:195–201.
  15. Williams, D.B. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fineneedle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience / D.B. Williams, A.V. Sahai, L. Aabakken et al. // Gut. — 1999. — Vol. 44. — P. 720–726.
  16. Boujaoude J. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma / J. Boujaoude // World J. Gastroenterol. — 2007. — Vol. 13(27). — P. 3662–3666.
  17. Filimonyuk A.V., Smirnova E.A., Tedoradze R.V. Features of diagnosis of adrenal tumors. Bulletin of RUDN, series: MEDICINE. 2013, no.1, pp. 77–83.
  18. Burdyukov MS, Nechipai A.M., Kudryavitsky E.E., et al. Ways to improve the efficiency of fine-needle puncture under the control of endosonography: a retrospective analysis of non-informative conclusions of morphological studies. Oncology Bulletin of the Volga region. 2017; 5(32):77–88.
  19. Sendino O. Complications of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUSFNA): a prospective investigation in a large series of patients / O. Sendino, P. Garcia, A.Z. Gimeno-Garcia et al. // Gastrointest Endosc. — 2007. — Vol. 65. — AB199.

Full text is published :
Burdyukov M.S., CHistyakova O.V., YUrichev I.N., Malihova O.A., Nechipaj A.M. Fine-needle puncture under endoscopic ultrasonography in the bulk formations of the adrenal glands. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;157(9): 121–127. DOI: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-157-9-121-127.
Read & Download full text