Submission of the manuscript is online via e-mail
ecgarticle@gmail.com or
cholerez@mail.ru

Tel: +7 903 250 5288

Editorial Correspondence e-mail
gastrossr@gmail.com


Publishing, Subscriptions, Sales and Advertising, Correspondence e-mail
journal@cniig.ru

Tel: +7 917 561 9505

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

    1. Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Institute of Medicine (Moscow, Russian Federation)

    Keywords:malignant dysphagia,malignant esophageal stenosis,esophageal stenting,self-expanding metal stents,SEMS

    Abstract:Aim: retrospective analysis of the results of stenting versus surgical gastrostomy in patients with malignant dysphagia. Material and methods: 172 patients underwent endoscopic stenting (107) or surgical gastrostomy (65). Level of stenosis: esophagus (70/48), gastric cardia (32/16), esophagogastro- or esophagojejunoanastomoses (5/1). 109 self-expanding metal stents were implanted in 107 patients; 63 Cader and 2 Witzel gastrostomies were performed in surgical group. Results: Stents were successfully inserted in all patients. Early complications were observed in 11 (10,3%) patients after stenting and in 10 (15,4%) after surgical palliation, p=0,2246. In-hospital mortality was 4,7% (5 patients) after stenting and 33,8% (22 patients) after gastrostomy, p<0,0001. Mean hospital stay was 13 days (quartile range 9-17) in stenting group and 15 days (quartile range 12-20) in surgical group, p=0,0040. There was no statistically significant difference in long-term results, neither in late complications (p=0,2212), nor in survival (p=0,0829). Conclusion: Endoscopic placement of self-expanding stents is an effective method of restoration of oral intake in patients with malignant dysphagia. Stenting is associated with equal rates of early and late complications, lower mortality and decreased in-hospital stay as compared with surgical gastrostomy, and therefore may be recommended as a final palliation in inoperable patients.

      1. Давыдов М. И., Стилиди И. С. Рак пищевода. - 3-изд., испр. и доп. - М.: Издательская группа РОНЦ, Практическая медицина, 2007. - 392 с.
      2. Knight B. C., Jamieson G. G. Oesophagus. In: Wichmann M. W., Maddern G. (ed.) Palliative surgery: Springer; 2014: 125-144.
      3. Жерлов Г. К., Васильченко М. И., Зыков Д. В. Арефлюксные гастростома и еюностома. - Томск: Изд. ТПУ, 1997. - 142 с.
      4. Saha S., Bose A., Chowdhary P. Feeding tube enterostomies in upper aerodigestive tract cancers // Int J Head Neck Surg. 2010; 1 (1): P. 9-16.
      5. Symonds C. J. A case of malignant stricture of the esophagus illustrating the use of the new form of esophageal catheter // Trans Chir Soc Lond 1885; 18: 155-158.
      6. Tytgat G. N.J., den Hartog Jager F. C.A., Bartelsman J. F.W.M. Endoscopic prosthesis for advanced esophageal cancer // Endoscopy 1986; 18 (Suppl. 3): 32-39.
      7. Frimberger E. Expanding spiral - a new type of prosthesis for the palliative treatment of malignant esophageal stenoses // Endoscopy 1983; 15: 213-214.
      8. Domschke W., Foerster E. Ch., Matek W., Rödl W. Self-expanding mesh stent for esophageal cancer stenosis // Endoscopy 1990; 22: 134-136.
      9. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Evans J. A., Early D. S., Chandraskhara V., et al. The role of endoscopy in the assessment and treatment of esophageal cancer // Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77 (3): 328-334.
      10. Hirdes M. M.C., Siersema P. Endoprosthetics for malignant esophageal disease // Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 16: 64-70.
      11. Parthipun A., Diamantopoulos A., Shaw A., et al. Self-expanding metal stents in palliative malignant oesophageal dysplasia // Ann Palliat Med 2014; 3 (2): 92-103.
      12. Рабкин И. Х., Мамонтов А. С., Прозоров С. А. Первый опыт клинического применения рентгеноэндоэзофагеального протезирования // Тезисы IX Всесоюзного симпозиума «Новые технологии в рентгенохирургии». - М., 1989. - С. 39-40.
      13. Малихова О. А., Поддубный Б. К. Эндоскопическое стентирование органов желудочно-кишечного тракта при опухолевых и рубцово-воспалительных стенозах // Тихоокеанский медицинский журнал 2008; 4 (прил.): 80-83.
      14. Соколов В. В., Карпова Е. С., Павлов П. В. и др. Варианты эндоскопического лечения при раке пищевода и желудка у инкурабельных больных // Эндоскопия 2012; 4: 2-10.
      15. Новиков В. Н., Ложкина Н. В. Стентирование пищевода и пищеводных анастомозов при неопластическом стенозе // Вестник хирургии 2014; 173 (2): 14-17.
      16. Годжелло Э. А., Хрусталёва М. В., Титова И. В. Восьмилетний опыт стентирования злокачественных стенозов пищевода и пищеводных анастомозов металлическими протезами // Доктор.Ру. Гастроэнтерология 2015; 2 (103); Часть II: 65.
      17. Владыко А. К., Каспаров Э. В., Шульмин А. В., Козлов В. В. Эндопротезирование (стентирование) пищевода. Опыт применения на территории Красноярского края с учётом экономического анализа // Врач-аспирант 2013; 60 (5.1): 129-134.
      18. Мумладзе Р. Б., Чеченин Г. М., Лебедев С. С. и др. Сравнение результатов стентирования пищевода и формирования гастростомы лапаротомным методом у больных с дисфагией, вызванной неоперабельным опухолевым поражением пищевода // Медицинский вестник Башкортостана 2013; 8 (4): 35-40.
      19. Гафтон Г. И., Щербаков А. М., Егоренков В. В., Гельфонд В. М. Нарушение проходимости желудочно-кишечного тракта // Практическая онкология 2006; 7 (2): 77-83.
      20. Булыгин Л. Г., Ария Н. Р., Адиев Р. Ф. и др. Разработка метода наложения постоянной щелевидной гастростомы // Медицинский вестник Башкортостана 2014; 9 (4): 69-71.
      21. Годжелло Э. А., Хрусталёва М. В., Галлингер Ю. И., Пермяков В. Б. Эндоскопическая коррекция поздних осложнений стентирования саморасправляющимися эндопротезами при бластоматозных поражениях пищевода, кардии и пищеводных анастомозов // Альманах института хирургии им. А. В. Вишневского 2012; 7 (1): 158-159.
      22. Королёв М. П., Роман Л. Д., Федотов Л. Е. и др. Эндопротезирование пищевода саморасправляющимися стентами при стенозирующих заболеваниях пищевода // Материалы II Всероссийской научно-практической конференции «Актуальные вопросы эндоскопии», Санкт-Петербург, 2011: 58-60.
     


    Full text is published :
    Davydova S.V., Fedorov A.G., Klimov A.E. ESOPHAGEAL STENTING VERSUS GASTROSTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANT DYSPHAGIA. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2016;128(04):13-19
    Read & Download full text

    1. Clinical hospital № 61 (Moscow, Russian Federation)
    2. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine (Moscow, Russian Federation)

    Keywords:colonic bleeding,colonoscopy,endoscopic hemostasis,polypectomy

    Abstract:For 3 years at the Research Institute of Emergency Care by NV Sklifosovsky received 174 patients with clinical bleeding from the lower gastrointestinal tract. The first group included 76 patients (43.7%) with confirmed at colonoscopy bleeding, the second - 98 patients (56.3%) with no signs of bleeding. Research has shown that the structure of colonic hemorrhage in recent years has changed. If you have previously most often the source of bleeding is cancer and colon diverticula, now the leading source of bleeding is erosive or hemorrhagic colitis. Endoscopic hemostasis was performed in 5.2% of patients, and electroexcision of the polyps - at 9.2%.

      1. Крылов Н, Самохвалов А. Кровотечения из нижних отделов желудочно-кишечного тракта// Врач, 2011. - № 13. - С. 10-16.
      2. Урядов С. Е., Шапкин Ю. Г., Капралов С. В. Эндоскопический гемостаз при толстокишечных кровотечениях // Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал. 2010. Т 6, № 3. С. 719-722.
      3. Овчинников А. А. Кровотечения из нижних отделов желудочно-кишечного тракта // Медицинская помощь. 2003. № 5. С. 13-17.
      4. Рубцов В. С., Урядов С. Е., Шапкин Ю. Г. Методы эндоскопического гемостаза при хирургических заболеваниях ободочной кишки // Современные проблемы науки и образования. - 2012, № 2.
      5. Хантаков А. М., Брегель А. И. Эндоскопическая диагностика толстокишечных кровотечений // Бюллетень восточно-сибирского научного центра СО РАМН. - 2008, № 6, С. 14-15.
      6. A European view of diagnostic yield and appropriateness of colonoscopy / J. J. Gonvers, J/ K/ Harris, V. Wietlisbach et al. // Hepatogastroenterology. 2007. - Vol. 54, № 75. - P. 729-735.
      7. Kawamura T, Yasuda K, Tanaka K. et al. Clinical evaluation of a newly developed single-balloon enteroscope// Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2008. - Vol. 68, № 6. - P. 1112-1116.
      8. Barnard J. Screening and surveillance recommendations for gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes // J PediatrGastroenterolNutr. - 2009. - V. 48. - Suppl 2. - P. 75-8.
      9. Shoaib A., Hamade A., Zia A., Basnyat P. S., Taffinder N. Why wait for a colonoscopy? Aneasycure // Colorectal Dis. 2006. - V. 8. - № 6. - P. 480-3.
     


    Full text is published :
    Pinchuk T.P., Kononenko N.S., Sogreshilin S.S. ENDOSCOPIC DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF COLONIC BLEEDING. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2016;128(04):20-23
    Read & Download full text

    1. Riga Stradins University, Department of Pathology (Riga, Latvia)
    2. Riga East Clinical University Hospital, Pathology Centre (Riga, Latvia)
    3. Riga Stradins University, Department of Internal diseases; Riga East Clinical University Hospital, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition clinic (Riga, Latvia)

    Keywords:upper gastrointestinal tract,bleeding,diagnostic errors,co-morbidities

    Abstract:Background. Endoscopists, surgeons and gastroenterologists have emphasized the importance of bleeding from oesophageal varicose veins, stomach and duodenum peptic ulcers and malignancies of this region, but less attention has been paid to the role of gastric erosions. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) may happen not only due to primary pathologies of UGI organs but also in case of different concomitant non-oncological and oncological pathologies. Possibilities of autopsies are the detection of real cause of death and misdiagnosed cases with gastrointestinal bleeding. Aim of the study. To analyse UGIB autopsy cases with different co-morbidities. Methods. We have investigated 120 cases of death from UGIB during the period of 2013-2014. Clinical information and laboratory analyses were obtained from the hospital electronic database. Pathology protocols and histological specimens stained with haematoxylin-eosin were analyzed. Diameter, depth and the total area of erosions were evaluated. We focused as well as on the site of death of the patient: whether it happened in hospital or outside it. Risk factors for UGIB were counted by Rockall numerical scoring system but Forrest scale was used for bleeding evaluation. Results. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) the patients, who died of profuse bleeding in connection with the upper digestive organ pathology (n=84), 2) the patients with bleeding developed mostly from erosions as a different disease complication (n=36). The main causes of fatal bleeding of I group persons were: gastric ulcer -38.1%, duodenal ulcer -11. 9%, oesophageal varices -30.9%. 28% of patients had such co-morbidities as: liver steatosis, different localization atherosclerosis and chronic forms of coronary heart disease, chronic pulmonary emphysema and nephrosclerosis. Rockall score was 4. Main illnesses of the II group of patients in case of secondary bleeding from gastric erosions were general atherosclerosis, cardiac pathologies with cardiac failure, chronic pulmonary diseases and non gastric malignancies. In contrast, the duodenal erosions were mostly found in chronic alcoholics with simultaneous pancreas and liver damage. Number of erosions in the stomach and duodenum ranged from 7 to 20. The average value of erosion diameter was 4.7 ± 1.3 mm. Rockall score was 8. Gastric and duodenal tissue tests confirmed the diagnosis of hemorrhagic erosive gastritis and duodenitis. The main diagnosis in this group of patients was correct in 84% of cases, but clinical information about gastric or duodenal bleeding was very insignificant.100 ml to 1.5 litres of blood was found in the stomach in both groups of patients. 29% of all patients died at the stage before hospitalisation. 48% of the patients were in the hospital from a few hours to 1 day. Conclusion. The improvement of the diagnostics of UGIB restricts delays in hospitalization, people low level of responsibility for their own health and insufficient information from family doctors about the patient background chronic diseases.

      1. Sung JJ, Tsoi KK, Ma TK, et al. Causes of mortality in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective cohort study of 10,428 cases. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105(1):84-91.
      2. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, et al. Incidence of and mortality from acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. Steering Committee and members of the National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. BMJ 1995;311: 222-226.
      3. Kinoshita Y, Di Bonaventura M, Rossi B, et al. Burden comorbidities among Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: a case study of dyspepsia. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2013 May 20;6: 51-59.
      4. Enestvedt BK, Gralnek IM, Mattek N, et al. (2008) An evaluation of endoscopic indications and findings related to nonvariceal upper-GI haemorrhage in a large multicentre consortium. Gastrointest Endosc 67(3): 422-429
      5. Toljamo K, Niemelä S, Karvonen A-L, et al. (2011) Histopathology of gastric erosions. Association with etiological factors and chronicity. Helicobacter 16(6): 444-451.
      6. Acosta RD, Wong RK Differential diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding proximal to the ligament of Trietz. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2011 Oct;21 (4):555-66.
      7. Nahon S, Pariente A, Nalet B, et al. (2010) Causes of mortality related to peptic ulcer bleeding in a prospective cohort of 965 French patients: a plea for primary prevention. Am J Gastroenterol 105: 1902-1903.
      8. Lassen A, Hallas J, Shaffalitzky de Muckadell OB Complicated and uncomplicated peptic ulcers in a Danish county 1993-2002: a population-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:945-53.
      9. Roulson J, Benbow EW, Hasleton PS Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post mortem histology; a meta-analysis and review. Histopathology 2005, 47:551-559.
      10. Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, et al. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med 1983: 308:1000-1005.
      11. Roulson J, Benbow EW, Hasleton PS Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post mortem histology; a meta-analysis and review. Histopathology 2005, 47:551-559.
      12. Jakobson T, Karjagin J, Vipp L, et al. Postoperative complications and mortality after major gastrointestinal surgery. Medicina (2014); 50 (2): 111-117.
      13. Kleina R, Franckevica I, Sperga M et al. Papers on Anthropology XX / Tartu University Press 2011: 199-208.
      14. Pastores SM1, Dulu A, Voigt L, et al. Premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill cancer patients. Crit Care. 2007;11(2): R48.
      15. Schwanda-Burger S, Moch H, Muntwyler J, et al. Diagnostic errors in the new millennium: a follow-up autopsy study Modern Pathology (2012) 25, 777-783.
      16. Sumskiene J1, Janciauskas D, Pilkauskaite G, et al. An unusual case of bleeding from stomach due to a giant diospyrobezoar.Medicina (Kaunas). 2009; 45(6):476-479.
      17. Mukans M, Mukane M, Kaminskis A, et al. Independent mortality risk factors in patients with acute upper non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding in Latvia 8th BAS Congress. Abstracts. 2015, Tallinn: 31.
      18. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut 1996: 38:316-21.
      19. Forrest JA, Finlayson ND, Shearman DJ. Endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding. Lancet 1974;2:394-397.
      20. Beggs AD, Dilworth MP, Powell SL et al. A systematic review of transarterial embolization versus emergency surgery in treatment of major nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2014; 7: 93-104.
      21. Cerulli, M.A. and Shahzad, I. (2014). Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Retrieved on 2016-02-07 from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/187857-overview.
      22. Kozek-Langenecker SA, Afshari A, Albaladejo P, et al. Management of severe perioperative bleeding. Guidelines from European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30:270-382.
      23. Leske M.c., Sorensen A. A., J. G. Zimmer (1978) Discrepancies between admission and discharge diagnoses in a university hospital. Medical care, Sept Vol. VI: 740-748.
      24. Bercovitz A, Moss A, Sengupta M et al. An overview of home health aides: United States, 2007. National Heath Statistics Reports N.34, May 19, 2011: 1-31.
      25. Vane S, Kleina R, Smits A Characteristics of fatal patient cases out of Riga hospitals. 3rd International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference. Society. Health. Welfare. Paris- Riga, 2012: 00036-p.1-3.
     


    Full text is published :
    Kleina R., Nazarovs Ju., Derovs A. UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING IN FATAL CASES WITH DIFFERENT CO-MORBIDITIES. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2016;128(04):24-29
    Read & Download full text

    1. City Clinical Hospital № 29 (Novokuznetsk, Russian Federation)
    2. Novokuznetsk State Institute of Postgraduate Medicine (Novokuznetsk, Russian Federation)

    Keywords:endoscopic papillotomy,acute biliary pancreatitis,papilla morphology,morphology of duodenal mucous

    Abstract:The aim of this study was to evaluate the morphological changes in the duodenum at acute biliary pancreatitis and after cholecystectomy and their influence on the frequency of EPST use at acute biliary pancreatitis. Materials and methods. Multicentre cohort study. A retrospective analysis of medical records of 535 patients with proven biliary pancreatitis from 2007 to 2013. Men - 212 (39.63%), 323 women (60.37%). The average age of 54,83 ± 14,17. The prospective study in 2013-2015 included similar 100 patients, mean age 59,27 ± 16,66 years. Duodenoscopy performed in all patients during the first 4 days. All of these patients underwent biopsy of duodenal mucosa near the papilla Vater. For comparison, 34 morphological studies performed of zone papilla Vater in patients with cholelithiasis after papillotomy. 28 women (82.3%), 6 males (17.7%) aged 25 to 82 years. Statistical analysis performed using the software Statistica 6.0 and SPSS19.0 Results. Frequency of EPST at acute biliary pancreatitis was 16.9%. In a retrospective analysis of the most significant causes of EPST were papillitis (φ = 0,950), functional stenosis of papilla (φ = 0,643), cicatrical stenosis of papilla (φ = 0,299) and obstruction of papilla by stone (φ = 0,299). In a prospective study dominated cicatrical stenosis of papilla (φ = 0,783) and obstruction of papilla by stone (φ = 0,446). Morphological studies of duodenal mucosa showed significant dependence of expression of morphological changes from the severity of acute biliary pancreatitis. Morphological assessment of papillae revealed the prevalence of chronic inflammatory changes, but the frequency of involvement in the inflammation of the deep layers were similar (18% vs. 15%). Conclusion. Frequency of duodenal inflammatory changes and inflammatory changes of papilla are connected among themselves. Endoscopic signs of duodenitis and papillit with expansion of a longitudinal fold demand early correction.

      1. Минушкин О. Н. Синдром после холецистэктомии в практике терапевта и гастроэнтеролога// Лечащий врач 2015; 2: 40-46.
      2. Навджавонова Н. О., Стегний К. В., Удалова С. В. Выбор тактики хирургического лечения пациентов с бессимптомной патологией внепеченочных желчных протоков на основе МРТ-холангиографии//Хирург 2015; 8: 18-24.
      3. Осложнения желчнокаменной болезни и хирургического вмешательства как причины постхолецистэктомического синдрома/Паршиков В.В., Фирсова В. Г., Градусов В. П., и др.//Медицинский альманах. 2011; 5: 266-269
      4. Постхолецистэктомический синдром: патогенетические и клинические аспекты проблемы/Колпакова Н.В., Чеснокова Л. В., Шестакова Н. В., и др.//Уральский медицинский журнал 2011; 6 (84): 26-31.
      5. Бордин Д. С. Рекомендации научного общества гастроэнтерологов России по диагностике и лечению желчнокаменной болезни//Экспериментальная и клиническая гастроэнтерология. 2012. № 4. С. 114-123.
      6. Желчнокаменная болезнь как возможное проявление системной патологии органов пищеварения/Вахрушев Я.М., Горбунов А. Ю., Тронина Д. В., и др.// Терапевтический архив 2015; 87 (2): 54-58.
      7. Роль патологических изменений билиарно-панкреатодуоденальной зоны в развитии постхолецистэктомического синдрома/Лебедев С. В., Еремеев А. Г., Татаринов А. П., Свистунов И. О.// Экспериментальная и клиническая гастроэнтерология. 2013; 11: 34-37.
      8. Применение эндоскопической ретроградной холангиопанкреатографии при лечении острого некротического панкреатита/Г.В. Родоман, А. А. Соколов, Т. И. Шалаева и др.// Лечебное дело 2015; 2: 56-62
      9. Лапароскопическая фиброхоледохоскопия в хирургии холедохолитиаза /С.И. Возлюбленный, М. Ф. Черкасов, Е. Н. Деговцов и др. //Хирургия 2009; 2: 44-46
      10. Epidemiology, aetiology and outcomes of acute pancreatitis: A retrospective cohort study/Nesvaderani M, Eslick GD, Vagg D et al.// Int J Surg. 2015; 23(Pt A): 68-74
      11. Коррекция регионарного кровообращения в комплексном лечении больных острым панкреатитом / Лубянский В. Г., Арутюнян Г. А., Алиев А. Р., и др.// Анналы хирургической гепатологии 2014; 3: 86-91.
      12. Baron N. H., Morgan D. E. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis // N. Engl. J. Med. 1999; 340 (18): 1412-1417
      13. Early endoscopic ultrasonography in acute biliary pancreatitis: A prospective pilot study/A. Anderloni, M. Galeazzi, M. Ballarè et al.// World J Gastroenterol 2015 September 28; 21(36): 10427-10434
      14. Морфологические изменения фатерова сосочка у больных после экстренной папиллотомии/В.В. Николаев, А. В. Оноприев, О. Н. Понкина, Г. Г. Коротько//Клиническая эндоскопия 2007; 4 (13): 16-21
      15. Структурная реорганизация слизистой оболочки двенадцатиперстной кишки при хроническом панкреатите/Васильев А.В., Бакарев М. А., Лапий Г. А., Проценко С. И.// Фундаментальные Исследования 2012; 7: 278-282
      16. Вахрушев Я. М., Лукашевич А. П., Горбунов А. Ю. Изучение функционального состояния тонкой кишки при желчнокаменной болезни// Архивь внутренней медицины 2015; 5 (25): 22-25
      17. Современные подходы к комплексному лечению билиарного панкреонекроза/М.Д. Дибиров, Т. А. Атаев, В. Н. Ющук и др.// Неотложная медицинская помощь 2014; 1: 17-19
      18. Диагностика и лечение острого билиарного панкреатита/ Шаповальянц С. Г., Мыльников А. Г., Орлов С. Ю. и др.// Анналы хирургической гепатологии 2009; 14 (1): 29-33
      19. The role of ERCP in benign diseases of the biliary tract/ ASGE Standards Of Practice Committee: K. V. Chathadi, V. Chandrasekhara, R. D. Acosta, et al.// Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2015; 81 (4): 795-803
      20. Nastashenko IL. Transpapillary interventions for an acute pancreatitis//Klin Khir. 2015; 8: 32-34
      21. Rustagi T., Njei B. Timing of ERCP and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis: a Nationwide Population Based Study// Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2015; 81(5S): AB405
      22. Benefits of Early ERCP in Patients With Gallstone Pancreatitis With Biliary Obstruction in Absence of Cholangitis/R. Jinjuvadia, A. Saeed, A. Lenhart et al.// Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2015; 81 (5S): AB142
      23. Оценка эффективности минимально инвазивных лечебных вмешательств у больных острым деструктивным панкреатитом ((обзор литературы))/ В. Г. Зурабиани, А. В. Гаврилин, Г. К. Матвеева, М. В. Данилов// Анналы хирургической гепатологии 2007; 12 (1): 7-14
      24. Фармакоэкономический анализ лечения некоторых заболеваний органов пищеварения/Парфенов А.И., Васильев Ю. В., Ильченко А. А., и др.//Экспериментальная и клиническая гастроэнтерология 2011; 2: 97-105
      25. Колокольцев В. Б. Эндоскопические аспекты ранней диагностики и лечения больных с острым билиарным панкреатитом (клинико-морфологическое исследование): автореф. дисс. … к. м.н. - Омск, 2007
      26. Трифонова Э. В., Сайфутдинова Т. В., Сайфутдинов Р. Г. Отличие клиники ЖКБ у мужчин и женщин//Дневник казанской медицинской школы 2013; 2 (II): 33-36
      27. Дмитриев А. В. Особенности лечебно-диагностической тактики при билиарном панкреатите // Современные проблемы науки и образования 2014; 4;
      28. Прогнозирование острого билиарного панкреатита при ущемленном конкременте большого сосочка двенадцатиперстной кишки/Парфенов И.П., Ярош А. Л., Сергеев О. С. и др.// Анналы хирургической гепатологии 2010; 15 (2): 87-91
      29. Ратнер Г. Л., Корымасов Е. А., Горбунов Ю. В. Панкреонекроз: клинико-морфологические параллели и показания к операции / // Сборник тезисов IX Всероссийского съезда хирургов. - Волгоград. - 2000. - С. 99-100
      30. Малоинвазивные технологии в лечении желчнокаменной болезни, осложненной поражением внепеченочных желчных путей и большого сосочка двенадцатиперстной кишки / А. Е. Борисов, В. П. Земляной, С. Л. Непомнящая, и др. // Анналы хирургической гепатологии 2004; 2: 22-30
      31. Будзинский А. А., Коваленко Т. В. Возможности эндосонографии в диагностике стенозирующих поражений большого дуоденального сосочка// Клиническая эндоскопия 2007; 2 (11):30-34
      32. Study of the early management of acute pancreatitis/ Nesvaderani M, Eslick GD, Faraj S et al.// ANZ J Surg. 2015 Sep 24. doi: 10.1111/ans.13330. [Epub ahead of print]
      33. Дыньков С. М. Острый билиарный панкреатит. Оптимизация лечебно-диагностической тактики: автореф. … д. м.н. - Архангельск, 2006
      34. Васильев Ю. В., Селезнева Э. Я., Дубцова Е. А. Билиарный панкреатит // Экспериментальная и клиническая гастроэнтерология. 2011. № 7. С. 79-84
      35. Функциональные нарушения желудочно-кишечного тракта у больных, перенесших острый деструктивный панкреатит / Куликов Л. К., Смирнов А. А., Джаджанидзе И. М., и др. // Сибирский медицинский журнал (Иркутск) 2009; 86 (3): 43-46
      36. Бедин В. В., Заруцкая Н. В., Пельц В. А. Тактические подходы к лечению больных с неинфицированной формой панкреонекроза //Анналы хир. гепат. - 2007; 3: 160
     


    Full text is published :
    Korotkevich A.G., Leont’yev A.S., Yaroshchuk S.A., Bondarev O.I., Aksenov P.V. ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLOSPHINCTEROTOMY IN ACUTE BILIARY PANCREATITIS AS PREVENTION AND TREATMENT POSTCHOLECYSTECTOMICAL SYNDROME. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2016;126(04):30-36
    Read & Download full text

    1. The Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery” (Moscow, Russian Federation)

    Keywords:esophageal cyst,endoscopic ultrasonography,EUS

    Abstract:The aim of the study is to present an endoscopic ultrasound variety of esophageal cysts as a cause of diagnostic difficulties. Between 2005 and 2015 endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was performed in 31 patients with fluid intramural lesion of esophagus (22), stomach (5) and duodenum (4). It was found that intramural cysts can be located in any layers of the esophageal wall. Furthermore they can have the unusual echo-structure, which can lead to wrong conclusions. EUS should be included in the modern algorithm of examination of patients with so-called upper submucosal lesions. FNA may be performed if necessary.

      1. Исаков Ю. Ф., Степанов Э. А. Опухоли и кисты грудной полости у детей. М.: Медицина, 1975; 309 с.
      2. Гольберт З. В. Лавникова Г. А. Опухоли и кисты средостения (морфология и гистогенез внеорганных опухолей и кист средостения). Изд.«Медицина», Москва, 1965; 272 с.
      3. Emura T., Hashizume K., Asashima M: Experimental study of the embryogenesis of gastrointestinal duplication and enteric cyst. Pediatr Surg Int 2003, 19: 147-151.
      4. Степанов Э. А. Бронхогенные кисты средостения у детей. Грудная хирургия, 1961; 3: 74-80.
      5. Whitaker J. A., Deffenbaugh L. D., Cooke A. R. Esophageal duplication cyst. Case report. Am J Gastroenterol. 1980; 73: 329-332.
      6. Кусакина Г. К., Колычева Н. И., Адильгиреева С. Х. К морфологии резервных клеток выводных протоков слизистых желез пищевода при хроническом эзофагите. Арх. патол. 1978. - Т. 40, вып. 10. - С. 40-44.
      7. Kagun E., Leyda H., Liess H. Ron‘tgendiagnostik der Speiserohre. - Leipzig: Thieme, 1977: S311.
      8. Karaman I., Gürel D., Ünlü M., et al. Esophageal duplication cyst: A rare cause of back pain. Turk J Gastroenterol 2012; 23: 610-611.
      9. Wiechowska-Kozłowska A., Wunsch E., Majewski M., Milkiewicz P. Esophageal duplication cysts: Endosonographic findings in asymptomatic patients. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 1270-1272.
      10. Hawes R. H., Fockens P. Endosonography. Publisher: Saunders Elsevier; 2006; ISBN:1416029532: 344 p.
      11. Chaudhary V., Rana S. S., Sharma V., Sharma A. R., Nada R., Gupta R., Dutta U., Singh K., Bhasin D. K. Esophageal Duplication Cyst in an Adult Masquerading as Submucosal Tumor. Endosc Ultrasound 2013; 2(3): 165-167.
      12. Diehl D. L., Cheruvattath R., Facktor M. A., et al. Infection after endoscopic ultrasound-guided aspiration of mediastinal cysts. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 10: 338-40.
      13. Mansard M. J., Rao U., Rebala P., et al. Esophageal duplication cyst masquerading as a stromal tumor in an adult. Indian J Surg 2011; 73: 441-443.
      14. Kuhlman J. E., Fishman E. K., Wang K. P., et al. Esophageal duplication cyst: CT and transesophageal needle aspiration. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985; 145: 531-532.
      15. Ko S. F., Hsieh M. J., Lin J. W. et al. Bronchogenic cyst of the esophagus: clinical and imaging features of seven cases. Clin Imaging 2006; 30: 309-314.
      16. Noh H. J., Koo J. S., Oh H. Y., Yun J. W., Jung S. W., Lee E. S., Yim H. J., Lee S. W., Choi J. H. Lymphoepithelial cyst of the upper esophagus. Endoscopy 2011; 43: E254-E255.
      17. Vougiouklakis Th., Mitselou A., Dallas P., Peschos D., Stefanou D., Ioachim E., Charalabopoulos K., Agnantis N. J. Inclusion cyst of esophagus: case report and review of the literature. Experimental Oncology 2003; 25: 22-24.
      18. Tano S., Tanaka K., Iguchi T., Nishikawa K., Takayama R., Ninomiya K., Inoue H., Katsurahara M., Horiki N., Takei Y. Large retention cyst with chondromatous metaplasia in the esophagus. Endoscopy. 2011; 43 Suppl 2: E262- E263. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256531. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
      19. Versleijen M. W., Drenth J. P., Nagengast F. M. A case of esophageal duplication cyst with a 13-year follow-up period. Endoscopy. 2005 Sep; 37(9): 870-872.
      20. Jacob R., Hawkes N. D., Dallimore N., Butchart E. G., Thomas G. A., Maughan T. S. Case report: Squamous carcinoma in an oesophageal foregut cyst. Br J Radiol. 2003 May; 76 (905): 343-346.
      21. Peiper M., Lambrecht W., Kluth D., et al. Bleeding esophageal duplication detected in utero. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 1790-1791.
      22. Tapia R. H., White V. A. Squamous cell carcinoma arising in a duplication cyst of the esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1985; 80: 325-329.
      23. Toyoda H., Kobayashi N., Mukai K. et al. Endoscopic resection of coexisting superficial carcinoma and a retention cyst. Endoscopy 2000; 32: S41.
      24. Turkyilmaz A., Eroglu A., Subasi M. et al. Intramural esophageal bronchogenic cysts: a review of the literature. Dis Esophagus 2007; 20: 461-465.
      25. Ivekovic H., Jouret-Mourin A., Deprez P. H. Endoscopic fenestration of esophageal duplication cysts Endoscopy 2012; 44: E404-E405.
      26. Tahri N., Mnif L., Chtourou L., et al. Complete endoscopic management of tubular esophageal duplication in a young woman. Endoscopy 2012; 44 Suppl 2 UCTN: E261-E262.
      27. Joyce A.M, Zhang P.J, Kochman M. L. Complete endoscopic resection of an esophageal duplication cyst (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64 (Suppl. 02): 288-289.
      28. Sashiyama H., Miyazaki S., Okazaki Y. et al. Esophageal bronchogenic cyst successfully excised by endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 141-145.
      29. Gong W., Xiong Y., Zhi F. et al. Preliminary experience of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 231-235.
      30. Tang Xiaowei, Jiang Bo, Gong Wei. Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection of a bronchogenic esophageal cyst. Endoscopy 2014; 46: E626-E627.
     


    Full text is published :
    Bulganina N.A., Godzhello E.A., Khrustaleva M.V. ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF INTRAMURAL ESOPHAGEAL CYSTS. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2016;128(04):37-42
    Read & Download full text

    1. City Clinical Hospital # 1” (Moscow, Russian Federation)
    2. Endocrinology Research Center (Moscow, Russian Federation)
    3. Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute(Moscow, Russian Federation)
    4. Medical center “Mozhayka 10”(Moscow, Russian Federation)
    5. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Moscow, Russian Federation)

    Keywords:contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound,insulinoma,proinsulin,immunohistochemistry,enucleation,EUS

    Abstract:Since October 2015 we have started to use contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE EUS) in some patients, among them there were two patients with insulinomas. One patient with unknown origin hypoglycemia was interesting from the diagnostic viewpoint. The laboratory diagnostic problems were related to the fact that the tumor almost did not produce insulin. Just detecting hyperproinsulinaemia we managed to prove the endogenous hyperinsulinism. At topical diagnosis CE EUS was the only one method detected hyper-vascularized tumor in pancreatic isthmus. The tumor was successfully enucleated laparoscopically. Immunohistochemical study confirmed neuroendocrine tumor with predominant production of proinsulin. Normoglycemia was defined at two-month follow-up

      1. Grant C. S. Surgical aspects of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia //Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America. - 1999. - Т. 28. - №. 3. - С. 533-554.
      2. Chatziioannou A. et al. Imaging and localization of pancreatic insulinomas //Clinical imaging. - 2001. - Т. 25. - №. 4. - С. 275-283.
      3. Thompson G. B. et al. Reoperative insulinomas, 1927 to 1992: an institutional experience //Surgery. - 1993. - Т. 114. - №. 6. - С. 1196-204; discussion 1205-6.
      4. Simon D. et al. Reoperative surgery for organic hyperinsulinism: indications and operative strategy //World journal of surgery. - 1998. - Т. 22. - №. 7. - С. 666-672.
      5. Дедов И. И., Кривко А. А., Силина Т. Л., Кузнецов Н. С., Трошина Е. А. Методические рекомендации. «Инсулинома». Москва. 2013, издательство «Адаманть» 45 с.
      6. Дедов И. И., Мельниченко Г. А., Пронин В. С. и соавт. Клиника и диагностика эндокринных нарушений - М: Триада - 2005 г.
      7. Лавин Эндокринология - М: Практика -1999 г.
      8. Кузин Н. М., Егоров А. В. Нейроэндокринные опухоли поджелудочной железы. - М.: Медицина- 2001 г.
      9. Майстренко Н. А., Курыгин А. А., Хижа В. В. Диагностика и лечение инсулиномы //Анналы хирургической гепатологии. - 2010. - Т. 3. - С. 11.
      10. Richards M. L. et al. Pitfalls in the surgical treatment of insulinoma //Surgery. - 2002. - Т. 132. - №. 6. - С. 1040-1049.
      11. Hiramoto J. S. et al. Intraoperative ultrasound and preoperative localization detects all occult insulinomas //Archives of Surgery. - 2001. - Т. 136. - №. 9. - С. 1020-1026.
      12. Силина Т. Л. и др. Эндосонография в предоперационной диагностике инсулином //Эндокринная хирургия. - 2007. - №. 1. - С. 19-23.
      13. Силина Т. Л. и др. Задачи и возможности эндоскопического ультразвукового исследования в дооперационной топической диагностике инсулином поджелудочной железы //Экспериментальная и клиническая гастроэнтерология. - 2011. - №. 10.
      14. Silina T. et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound of 66 Insulinomas //Neuroendocrinology. - Allschwilerstrasse10, Ch-4009 Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 2010. - Т. 92. - №. 1. - С. 58-58.
      15. Silina T. et al. Mathematical method for objective estimation of endoscopic ultrasound images of pancreatic insulinomas //Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. - 2009. - Т. 69. - №. 2. - С. S257.
      16. Silina T. The Statistical Analysis of the EUS-Features of Insulinomas //Endoscopy. - 2011. - Т. 43. - №. S03. - С. A122.
      17. Ishikawa T. et al. Usefulness of EUS combined with contrast-enhancement in the differential diagnosis of malignant versus benign and preoperative localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors //Gastrointestinal endoscopy. - 2010. - Т. 71. - №. 6. - С. 951-959.
     


    Full text is published :
    Silina T.L., Molashenko N.V., Dalgatov K.D., Raksha A.P. et al. THE FIRST EXPERIENCE OF CONTRAST ENHANCED ENDOSONOGRAPHY IN CONTROVERSIAL DIAGNOSIS CASE OF PANCREATIC INSULINOMA. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2016;128(04):43-46
    Read & Download full text

    1. Orenburg State medical University(Orenburg, Russian Federation)
    2. Orenburg regional clinical Oncology center (Orenburg, Russian Federation)

    Keywords: INTESTINAL-COLONIC ANASTOMOSIS, SPHINCTER, gastrointestinal surgery

    Abstract:The article is devoted to one of the main problems of gastrointestinal surgery - the pathology of the colon, such as malignant tumors, diverticulosis, Crohn's disease, traumatic injuries, large benign tumors, and some other diseases. All of them require resection of the right half of the colon and the restoration of intestinal continuity by creating an anastomosis between the small and large intestine. However, such operations still have a very large number of complications. The most dangerous complication is the failure of the sutures of the colonic anastomoses and peritonitis that develops as a result, which is the main cause of death of patients. The article gives EXPERIMENTAL SUBSTANTIATION AND describes the CLINICAL APPLICATION OF NEW MICROSURGICAL METHODS of INTESTINAL-COLONIC ANASTOMOSIS WITH SPHINCTER PROPERTIES.

      1. Буценко В. Н., Камеристый В. А., Ахрамее В. Б. Отдаленные функциональные результаты правосторонней гемиколэктомии. //Клиническая хирургия. - 1988. - № 2. - С. 25-28
      2. Буценко В. Н., Камеристый В. А. Правосторонняя гемиколэктомия с применением сшивающих аппаратов. //Клиническая хирургия. - 1977. - № 7. - с. 57-58.
      3. Курыгин А. А., Кочерец В. И., Перегудов С. И. и др. Клинические аспекты синдрома избыточной колонизации. //Вестник хирургии. - 1993. - № 5-6. - С. 118-122.
      4. Кущ Н. П., Грона В. Н. и др. Непосредственные и отдаленные результаты резекции илеоцекального отдела кишечника. //Вестник хирургии. - 1981. - Т. 127. - № 11. - С. 84-87.
      5. Думанский Ю. В., Кравцова В. Н. и др. Восстановление непрерывности кишечника после правосторонней гемиколэктомии //Клиническая хирургия. - 1990. № 2. - с. 28-30.
      6. Иванов М. А. Выбор анастомоза при правосторонней гемиколэктомии //Вестник хирургии. - 1989. - № 6. - С. 144-14.
      7. Кочеровец В. И., Перегудов С. И., Ханевич М. Д. Синдром избыточной колонизации тонкой кишки. //Антибиотики и химиотерапия. - 1992. - Т. 37, № 3. - С. 39-44.
      8. Витебский Я. Д. Клапанные анастомозы в хирургии пищеварительного тракта. - М.: Медицина, 1988, 112 с.
      9. Жученко С. П., Кадощук Т. А., Бойко Г. А. Способ формирования замыкательного аппарата тонко-толстокишечного соустья. //Вестник хирургии. - 1990. - С. 71-72.
      10. Есин В.И., Салищев Р. Ф., Гришин Н. К. Однорядный анастомоз в колохирургии //Актуальные вопросы хирургии: Сб.научн.тр., посвященных 90-летию со дня рождения проф. А. И. Богатова - Астрахань, 1998. - с. 139-142
      11. Зиганьшин Р. В. и др. Компрессионные анастомозы в желудочно-кишечной хирургии, выполненные при помощи устройства с памятью «формы». //Хирургия. - 1990. - № 8. С. 115-120.
      12. Клур В.Ю. и др. Заживление толстокишечного анастомоза. //Вестник хирургии - 1989. - № 10. - с. 33-36.
      13. Кирпатовский И. Д. Кишечный шов и его теоретические основы. - М.: Медицина, 1964. - 174 с.
      14. Каган И. И. Микрохирургическая техника и деминерализованная кость в восстановительной хирургии полых органов и кровеносных сосудов. СПб: Эскулап, 1996. - 122с.
      15. Каган И. И., Третьяков А. А. Микрохирургическая техника в восстановительной хирургии полых и трубчатых органов. //Клиническая анатомия и экспериментальная хирургия: Ежегодник Российской ассоциации клинических анатомов. - Вып.1. - Оренбург - 2001. - С. 28-34.
      16. Петровский Б, В., Крылов В. С. Микрохирургия. - М.: Медицина, 1979. - 187с.
     


    Full text is published :
    Tretjakov A.A., Kagan I.I., Nikitenkov A.G., Dronova O.B. et al. EXPERIMENTAL SUBSTANTIATION AND CLINICAL APPLICATION OF NEW MICROSURGICAL METHODS INTESTINAL-COLONIC ANASTOMOSIS WITH SPHINCTER PROPERTIES. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2016;128(04):47-50
    Read & Download full text

    1. State University of Medicine and Pharmacy „Nicolae Testemitanu“ of the Republic of Moldova (Kishinev, Republic of Moldova)
    2. Labromed Laborator SRL company, Republic of Moldova (Kishinev, Republic of Moldova)

    Keywords:lower esophageal sphincter,electrical stimulation,gastroesophageal reflux disease

    Abstract:Study aims. Recently the possibility of LES tonus increasing by the means of implantable electrical stimulator was described. Although this method is already used in clinical practice, optimal parameters of LES electrical stimulation are still unknown. The goal of this study was obtaining of clinical data regarding effects of different modes of electrical stimulation on LES tonus. Methods. LES electrical stimulation using external pulse generator was assessed in 9 patients with severe GERD and decreased LES tonus. These patients underwent standard laparoscopic antireflux intervention with additional insertion of 2 temporary electrodes at the level of gastroesophageal junction. Three sets of parameters were studied: 1) low-frequency, long pulse (375 ms pulses, 5 mA at 6 pulse/min); 2) high-frequency stimulation (0.3 ms, 5 mA at 20 Hz); 3) high-frequency at 40 Hz (0.3 ms, 5 mA). High resolution esophageal manometry was used to assess changes in LES tonus. Results. Values of LES resting pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) were significantly different between prestimulation and poststimulation periods. The low-frequency, long pulse stimulation produces improvement of esophagogastric junction relaxation in the poststimulation period. Patients stimulated with the second and the third sets of parameters demonstrated moderate relaxation of LES during the stimulation period and considerable increase of sphincter tonus in the poststimulation period. Conclusions. Electrical stimulation of LES produces changes in its tonus. Modifications of LES function during the stimulation and after the stimulation period depend on frequency and pulse width. Further clinical studies are necessary for selection of optimal stimulation parameters, which can be applied in the treatment of GERD.

      1. Minjarez R., Blair A. Surgical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. GI Motility online, 2006, doi:10.1038/gimo56.
      2. Rodriguez L., Rodriguez P. A., Gomez B., Netto M. G. et al. Electrical stimulation therapy of the lower esophageal sphincter is successful in the treating GERD: long-term 3-year results. Surg.Endoscopy,2015, oct. Epub.
      3. Sanmiguel C. P., Hagiike M., Mintchev M. P. et al. Effect of electrical stimulation of the LES on LES pressure in a canine model. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2008, no. 295, pp.389-394.
      4. Xing J., Felsher J., Brody F., Soffer E. Gastric electrical stimulation significantly increases canine lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Dig Dis Sci, 2005, no.50, pp.1481-1487.
      5. Clarke J. O., Jagannath S. B., Kalloo A. N., Long V. R. et al. An endoscopically implantable device stimulates the lower esophageal sphincter on demand by remote control: a study using a canine model. Endoscopy, 2007, no. 39, pp. 72-76.
      6. Xing J. H., Lei Y., Chen J. D. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) with parameters for morbid obesity elevates lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in conscious dogs. Obes Surg, 2005, no.15, pp.1321-1327.
      7. Hoppo T., Rodríguez L., Soffer E., Crowell M. D. et al. Long-term results of electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter for treatment of proximal GERD. Surg Endosc, 2014, vol. 28, no.12, pp. 3293-301.
      8. Kahrilas P. J., Bredenoord A. J., Fox M., Gyawali C. P. et al. International High Resolution Manometry Working Group. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2015, vol.27, no.2, pp.160-74.
      9. Weijenborg P. W., Savarino E., Kessing B. F., Roman S. et al. Normal values of esophageal motility after antireflux surgery; a study using high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2015, vol. 27, no.7, pp. 929-35.
      10. Tøttrup A, Forman A, Funch-Jensen P, Raundahl U, Andersson KE. Effects oftransmural field stimulation in isolated muscle strips from human esophagus. Am J Physiol. 1990 Mar;258(3 Pt 1): G344-51.
      11. Gonzalez A. A., Farre R., Clave P. Different responsiveness of excitatory and inhibitory enteric motor neurons in the human esophagus to electrical field stimulation and to nicotine. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2004, 2004, no.287, pp. G299-G306.
      12. Ho J. S., Yeh A. J., Neofytou E., Kim S. et al. Wireless power transfer to deep-tissue microimplants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014, vol.111, no.22, pp. 7974-9.
     


    Full text is published :
    Ungureanu S.N., Lepadatu K.I., Sipitco N.I., Vidiborschii V.L. et al. INFLUENCE OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION ON FUNCTION OF THE LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER IN PATIENTS WITH GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2016;128(04):51-55
    Read & Download full text

    1. Branch Clinical Hospital at the Vladivostok Station, OAO «RZhD» (Vladivostok, Russian Federation)
    2. Pacific State Medical University (Vladivostok, Russian Federation)

    Abstract:The aim of the study was to test effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy in small colonic polyps ≤8 mm in size. Method. In all, 148 consecutive patients with 308 small colorectal polyps were treated with cold snare polypectomy (CSP). Results. The average polyp size was 5.2±1.8 mm. 93.6% of polyps have been retrieved. Lost polyps were smaller then retrieved ones 3.8±1.5 mm vs 5.3±1.7 mm (р=0,0002). R0 resection has been achieved in 88.9% of cases. Serrated morphology was the only risk factor for R1 resection (р=0,008). There was no perforation or delayed bleeding. Intraprocedural bleeding was rate was 1.6% Conclusion. The data show that the CSP technique is safe and effective for small polyp removal.

      1. Владимирова А. А., Чашкова Е. Ю., Григорьев Е. Г. и др. Особенности трансформации небольших эпителиальных новообразований толстой кишки // Колопроктология. - 2009. - № 1. - С. 4-9.
      2. Church JM. Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Apr;47(4):481-5.
      3. Tsai FC1, Strum WB. Prevalence of advanced adenomas in small and diminutive colon polyps using direct measurement of size. Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Aug;56(8):2384-8.
      4. Ichise Y, Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Tanaka N. Prospective randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. Digestion 2011; 84: 78-81.
      5. Paspatis GA, Tribonias G, Konstantinidis K et al. A prospective randomized comparison of cold versus hot snare polypectomy in the occurrence of postpolypectomy bleeding in small colonic polyps. Colorectal Dis. 2011; 13: e345-348.
      6. Robertson DJ. Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer prevention: is it fulfilling the promise? Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:118-120.
      7. Aslan F, Camcı M, Alper E, et al. Cold snare polypectomy versus hot snare polypectomy in endoscopic treatment of small polyps. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;25(3):279-83.
      8. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, et al. Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):417-23.
      9. Takeuchi Y, Yamashina T, Matsuura N, et al. Feasibility of cold snare polypectomy in Japan: A pilot study. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Nov 25;7(17):1250-6.
      10. Komeda Y, Suzuki N, Sarah M, et al. Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:395-400.
      11. Deenadayalu VP, Rex DK. Colon polyp retrieval after cold snaring. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:253-256.
      12. Fernandes C, Pinho R, Ribeiro I, et al. Risk factors for polyp retrieval failure in colonoscopy. United European Gastroenterol J. 2015 Aug;3(4):387-92.
      13. Din S, Ball AJ, Riley SA, et al. Cold snare polypectomy: does snare type influence outcomes? Dig Endosc. 2015 Jul;27(5):603-8.
      14. Bordaçahar B, Barret M, Terris B, et al. Sessile serrated adenoma: from identification to resection. Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Feb;47(2):95-102.
      15. Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E, et al. Safety of cold polypectomy for №10mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2012 Jan;44(1):27-31.
     


    Full text is published :
    Agapov M.Yu., Khalin K.D., Barsukov A.S., Ryzhkov E.F., Zvereva L.V. THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF COLD SNARE POLYPECTOMY FOR COLON POLYPS SIZE ≤ 8 MM. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2016;128(04):56-60
    Read & Download full text