Submission of the manuscript is online via e-mail
ecgarticle@gmail.com or
cholerez@mail.ru

Tel: +7 903 250 5288

Editorial Correspondence e-mail
gastrossr@gmail.com


Publishing, Subscriptions, Sales and Advertising, Correspondence e-mail
journal@cniig.ru

Tel: +7 917 561 9505

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

    1. Herzen Moscow Cancer Research Institute, branch of National Medical Research Radiology Center (St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)

    Abstract:Introduction Plexiform fibromyxoma (PFM) is a very rare gastric tumor, no more than 20 cases described in literature. PFM is a benign mesenchymal tumor, usually occurs in gastric antrum. PFM in pathology reports characterized as mixed-type tumor located in submucosal and mucosal layer of gastric wall., consists of smooth-muscle cells, located between plexiform stromal webs, positive for SMA and negative for CD 117, CD 34 and S-100 Objectives The main aims of presented clinical case is to identify typical endoscopic diagnostic sings of PFM and to evaluate possibilities of endoscopic treatment in such cases. Methods In 2016 in P. A. Herzen Cancer Research Institute one case of PFM was detected in asymptomatic 35 y. o. female patient. Multimodal endoscopic examination, consisted of white-light high definition (WLI-HD) endoscopy, narrow-band imaging with near focus (NBI-NF) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with 20MHz miniprobe, was performed for diagnostic purposes. For treatment of identified tumor endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was implemented. Results Multimodal endoscopic examination data showed, that PFM characterized as ulcerated polypoid submucosal lesion in gastric antrum. Gastric pits in ulceration margins, clearly visible with NB-NF, are elongated, but not distorted, intrapapillary capillary loops are broadened, but regular-shaped. EUS showed moderate-hypoechoic tumor mass in mucosa and 1/3 of submucosa, not invading muscularis propria. On the basis of the diagnostic data results, gastric PFM was suspected. Since lesion characterized with superficial invasion, ESD was performed, tumor resected en bloc. Pathology and immunohistochemical examination of retrieved specimen confirmed PFM diagnosis. Conclusion Gastric plexiform fibromyxoma has a specific endoscopic and endosonographic features, helpful for differential diagnostics. If tumor invading only mucosa and submucosal layer of gastric wall, it is safe to perform ESD as a treatment choice.

      1. Inoue Y. [и др.]. Laparoscopy endoscopy cooperative surgery for gastric plexiform fibromyxoma: a case report // Surgical Case Reports. 2016. № 1 (2).
      2. Kane J. [и др.]. Plexiform fibromyxoma with cotyledon-like serosal growth: A case report of a rare gastric tumor and review of the literature // Oncology Letters. 2016.
      3. Kim A. [и др.]. Plexiform Angiomyxoid Myofibroblastic Tumor of the Stomach: A Case Report // Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2011. № 11 (26). C. 1508.
      4. Li P. [и др.]. Case Report Presence of smooth muscle cell differentiation in plexiform angiomyxoid myofibroblastic tumor of the stomach: a case report // Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014. № 2 (7). C. 823-827.
      5. Miettinen M. [и др.]. Plexiform Fibromyxoma: A Distinctive Benign Gastric Antral Neoplasm Not to be Confused With a Myxoid GIST // The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2009. № 11 (33). C. 1624-1632.
      6. Sakamoto K. [и др.]. A case of gastric plexiform fibromyxoma: radiological and pathological findings // Japanese Journal of Radiology. 2014. № 7 (32). C. 431-436.
      7. Sing Y. [и др.]. Gastric plexiform angiomyxoid myofibroblastic tumor: Gastric plexiform angiomyxoid tumor // Pathology International. 2010. № 9 (60). C. 621-625.
      8. Takahashi Y. Plexiform angiomyxoid myofibroblastic tumor of the stomach // World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2010. № 23 (16). C. 2835.
     


    Full text is published :
    Pirogov S.S., Sokolov V.V., Kaprin A.D., Volchenko N.N. et al. ENDOSCOPIC DIAGNOSTICS AND TREATMENT OF GASTRIC PLEXIFORM FIBROMYXOMA. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2017;140(04):117-120
    Read & Download full text