Submission of the manuscript is online via e-mail
ecgarticle@gmail.com or
cholerez@mail.ru

Tel: +7 903 250 5288

Editorial Correspondence e-mail
gastrossr@gmail.com


Publishing, Subscriptions, Sales and Advertising, Correspondence e-mail
journal@cniig.ru

Tel: +7 917 561 9505

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

    1. Moscow research cancer Institute. P. A. Herzen-branch of the national medical research radiological center of the Ministry of health of Russia (Moscow, Russian Federation)

    Keywords:chronic inflammation, tumorigenesis, pro-oncogenic mutations, microsatellite instability, Nuclear factor of kappa light gene polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells (NF-κB), MicroRNAs, tumor necrosis factor, miR-155, Helicobacter pylori

    Abstract:The interplay between chronic inflammation and tumorigenesis has been widely discussed. Chronic inflammation induces premalignant changes in tissues (tissue metaplasia, atrophic changes, etc.) and promotes local tumor invasion, metastatic spread and tumor progression. Chronic inflammation can also induce changes of the DNA, promoting accumulation of pro-oncogenic mutations, which results in development of specific tumor environment as well as selection of chemo- and radioresistant tumor cells. Suppression of innate and acquired immunity caused by chronic inflammation also promotes tissue changes, increasing the likelihood of tumor development. The synergistic action of all above mentioned factors is implicated in development of multiple malignant neoplasms in a variety of organs. In this article the intricate interplay between chronic inflammation and tumorigenesis in various organs and organ systems is discussed. The understanding of these processes is of greatest importance, especially in gastroenterology, caused by relative prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases and peptic ulcer disease. Further understanding of these processes can help further improve the diagnostic and treatment approaches to malignant tumors, as well as prevention of inflammation-induced tumor progression.

      1. Dawit K., Wook J. C., Jennifer C., Kristin A., Eckert P. М., Glazer A. L., Bothwell M., and Sweasy J. B. Interplay between DNA repair and inflammation, and the link to cancer. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2014 Mar-Apr; 49(2): 116-139.
      2. Coussens L. M., Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):860-7.
      3. Colotta F., Allavena P., Sica A., Garlanda C., Mantovani A. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis, Volume 30, Issue 7, 1 July 2009, Pages 1073-1081, https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgp127.
      4. Dizdaroglu M. Oxidatively induced DNA damage: mechanisms, repair and disease.Cancer Lett. 2012 Dec 31; 327(1-2):26-47. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
      5. Kim H. W., Murakami A., Williams M. V., Ohigashi H. Mutagenicity of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species as detected by co-culture of activated inflammatory leukocytes and AS52 cells. Carcinogenesis. 2003 Feb; 24(2):235-41.
      6. McCool K.W., Miyamoto S. Review DNA damage-dependent NF-κB activation: NEMO turns nuclear signaling inside out. Immunol Rev. 2012 Mar; 246(1):311-26.
      7. Karl S., Pritschow Y., Volcic M., Häcker S., Baumann B., Wiesmüller L., Debatin K. M., Fulda S. Identification of a novel pro-apopotic function of NF-kappaB in the DNA damage response. J Cell Mol Med. 2009 Oct; 13(10):4239-56.
      8. Greten F. R. et al. IKKbeta links inflammation and tumorigenesis in a mouse model of colitis-associated cancer. Cell, 2004, vol. 118 (pg. 285-296).
      9. Volcic M., Karl S., Baumann B., Salles D., Daniel P., Fulda S., Wiesmüller L. NF-κB regulates DNA double-strand break repair in conjunction with BRCA1-CtIP complexesNucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan; 40(1):181-95.
      10. Balkwill F. Tumour necrosis factor and cancer, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2009, vol. 9 (pg. 361-371)
      11. Harrison M.L. et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha as a new target for renal cell carcinoma: two sequential phase II trials of infliximab at standard and high dose, J. Clin. Oncol., 2007, vol. 25 (pg. 4542-4549).
      12. Mantovani A. et al. Cancer-related inflammation, Nature, 2008, vol. 454 (pg. 436-444).
      13. Sakurai T. et al. Hepatocyte necrosis induced by oxidative stress and IL-1 alpha release mediate carcinogen-induced compensatory proliferation and liver tumorigenesis, Cancer Cell, 2008, vol. 14 (pg. 156-165).
      14. Babar I. A., Czochor J., Steinmetz A., Weidhaas J. B., Glazer P. M., Slack F. J. Inhibition of hypoxia-induced miR-155 radiosensitizes hypoxic lung cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2011 Nov 15; 12(10):908-14.
      15. Valeri N., Gasparini P., Fabbri M., Braconi C., Veronese A., Lovat F., Adair B., Vannini I., Fanini F., Bottoni A., Costinean S., Sandhu S. K., Nuovo G. J., Alder H., Gafa R., Calore F., Ferracin M., Lanza G., Volinia S., Negrini M., McIlhatton M.A., Amadori D., Fishel R., Croce C. M. Modulation of mismatch repair and genomic stability by miR-155. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 13; 107(15):6982-7.
      16. Krichevsky A. M., Gabriely G. J. MiR-21: a small multi-faceted RNA. Cell Mol Med. 2009 Jan; 13(1):39-53.
      17. Lawrie C. H., Soneji S., Marafioti T., Cooper C. D., Palazzo S., Paterson J. C., Cattan H., Enver T., Mager R., Boultwood J., Wainscoat J. S., Hatton C. S. MicroRNA expression distinguishes between germinal center B cell-like and activated B cell-like subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Int J Cancer. 2007 Sep 1; 121(5):1156-61.
      18. Loeb L. A. et al. DNA polymerases and human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet., 2008, vol. 9 (pg. 594-604).
      19. Mirzaee V. et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and expression of DNA mismatch repair proteins. World J. Gastroenterol., 2008, vol. 14 (pg. 6717-6721).
      20. Brentnall T. A. et al. Microsatellite instability in nonneoplastic mucosa from patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Cancer Res., 1996, vol. 56 (pg. 1237-1240).
      21. Kawashima T., Kosaka A., Yan H., Guo Z., Uchiyama R., Fukui R., Kaneko D., Kumagai Y., You D. J., Carreras J., Uematsu S., Jang M. H., Takeuchi O., Kaisho T., Akira S., Miyake K., Tsutsui H., Saito T., Nishimura I., Tsuji N. M. Double-stranded RNA of intestinal commensal but not pathogenic bacteria triggers production of protective interferon-β. Immunity. 2013 Jun 27; 38(6):1187-97.
     


    Full text is published :
    Saribekyan E.K., Zubovskaia A.G., Shkurnikov M.Yu. CHRONIC INFLAMMATION OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND CARCINOGENESIS. BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE RELATIONSHIP. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2018;152(04):76-82
    Read & Download full text

    1. NMIC Oncology. N. N. Blokhin” Of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow, Russian Federation)

    Keywords:gastric cancer, endoscopic ultrasound examination

    Abstract:Gastric cancer occupies the 5th place in the structure of total cancer incidence worldwide. In 2015, Russia diagnosed about 35 thousand new cases of rye. Mortality from this disease and its complications remains high. Numerous studies conducted in different countries of the world have shown that the dominant role among all anatomical forms of gastric cancer is played by endophytic tumors (more than 65% of all detected cases), which are the most difficult to diagnose. Even with the latest diagnostic tools, it is often not possible to obtain enough information to clearly speak in favor of the existence of an intra-neoplastic process. Optimization of diagnosis of gastric cancer continues to be one of the important problems of Oncology. The absence of changes in the mucous membrane, usually makes it impossible to determine the boundaries of the standard endoscopic and radiological methods. The possibilities of standard ultrasound examination of the stomach wall, and especially the esophagus wall, are also limited. The most promising in terms of complex diagnosis of intramural and lymphogenic prevalence of tumor process is the use of endoscopic ultrasound.

      1. Kaprin A. D., Starinskiy V. V., Petrova G. V. Osnovnyye pokazateli onkologicheskoy pomoshchi naseleniyu. Sostoyaniye onkologicheskoy pomoshchi naseleniyu Rossii v 2015 godu. [The main indicators of oncological care for the population. The state of oncological assistance to the population of Russia in 2015.] Moscow: MNIOI them. P. A. Herzen is a branch of the Federal Medical and Biological Center NIIRTs of the Russian Ministry of Health. Publ., 2016, 279 p.
      2. Davydova M. I., Aksel’ E. M. Zlokachestvennyye novoobrazovaniya v Rossii i stranakh SNG v 2001 godu. [Malignant neoplasms in Russia and the CIS countries in 2001] GU RONTS them. NN Blokhin RAMS. Moscow, Medical News Agency, 2003, 95–97 p, 223–224 p.
      3. Davydov M. I. Printsipy khirurgicheskogo lecheniya zlokachestvennykh opukholei v torakoabdominal’noi klinike. [Principles of surgical treatment of malignant tumors in the thoracoabdominal clinic] Vopr onkol 2002; 4–5: 468–479.
      4. Ji Yeong An, Ho Geun Youn, Min Gew Choi et al. The difficult choice between total and proximal gastrectomy in proximal early gastric cance. Am. J. Surg. – 2008. – N196. – P. 587–591
      5. Miyazono F., Natsugoe S., Ishigami S. et al. Histological differences in the invasion of the advanced esophageal and gastric carcinoma beyond thе esophago-gastric junction // Gastric Cancer. – 2002. – Vol. 3. – P. 45–49
      6. Davydov M. I., Ter-Ovanesov M.D., Makhovsky V. V. The state of the problem and ways to optimize the tactics of surgical treatment of patients with stomach cancer of the older age group. Surgery. 2008, no.10, pp. 73–79
      7. Grigor’ev GYa, Yakovenko EP. [Stomach cancer]. Diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the digestive. Sankt-Peterburg. 1997, 396–402 p. (In Russia)
      8. Portnoy L. M., Dibirov M. P. Luchevaya diagnostika endofitnogo raka zheludka. [Radiation diagnosis of endophytic gastric cancer.] Medicine Publ., 1993. 3–4, 9–18, 203–230 p.
      9. Kaneko K., Kondo H., et al. Early gastric stump cancer following distal gastrectomy. Gut.-1998.V.43.-P.342–344.
      10. Samtsov E. N., Luneva S. V., Velichko S. A. Vozmozhnosti kompleksnoy ekhografii v otsenke vnutri- stenochnogo rasprostraneniya raka zheludka [The possibilities of complex echography in assessing the intra-wall distribution of gastric cancer] Sibirskiy onkologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Cancer Journal. 2006, no.3, pp. 64–67
      11. Tsuda Y. Endoscopic observation of gastric lesions with a dye7spraying technique// Endoscopic Gastroenterology – 1987. – Vol. 9. – P. 189–195/
      12. Yoshida S., Yamaguchi H., Saito D., Kido M. Endoscopic diagnosis: latest trends// Gastric Cancer/ Nishi M., Ichikawa H. et al. (eds.). – Springer7Verlag, 1993. – P. 246–262
      13. Turkin I. N. Strategiya khirurgii raka zheludka. Diss. dokt. med. nauk. [The strategy of stomach cancer surgery. Doct. Diss.] Moscow, 2013. 391 p.
      14. Turkin I. N., Ibraev M. A., Davydov.M.M., Perfiliev I. B. Abdominomediastinal access posibilities with use of the circular stapler in patients with stomach cancer with high transition to the gullet. Journal of N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center 2015; 26(3):39–49.
      15. Zherlov G. K., Sokolov S. A., Rudaya N. S. et al. Rukovodstvo po ul’trazvukovoy diagnostike zabolevaniy pishchevoda, zheludka i dvenadtsatiperstnoy kishki [Guide to ultrasound diagnosis of diseases of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum]. Novosibirsk: Science Publ., 2005. 208 p.
      16. Starkov Yu.G., Solodinina E. N., Shishi K. V. Development of diagnostic technologies in endoscopy and presentday potential for diagnosing gastrointestinal tract neoplasms. Pacific Medical Journal, 2009, no.2, pp. 35–39
      17. Korneyev K. A., Zhitov D. I., Laletin V. G., Kukarin V. V. Vozmozhnosti zondovoy endoskopicheskoy ul’trasonografii v diagnostike opukholey pishchevoda [Possibilities of probe endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of esophageal tumors]. Siberian journal of oncology. 2010, no.1, pp.60
      18. Davydov M. M., Turkin I. N., et al. One-step esophago-gastrec tomies in oncology. Vestnik Moskovskogo Onkologicheskogo Obshchestva – Bulletin of the Moscow Cancer Society 2011, 574(1), pp.2–7
      19. Kruglova I. I., Kozlov S. V., Malikhova O. A. Endosonograficheskaya diagnostika epitelial’nykh i neepitelial’nykh zlokachestvennykh novoobrazovaniy zheludka [Endosonographic diagnosis of epithelial and non-epithelial malignant neoplasms of the stomach]. Samarskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal – Samara Medical Journal 2008;41(1):57–60
      20. Kruglova I. I., Morozova M. A. Opyt endoskopicheskogo monitoringa bol’nykh so zlokachestvennymi novoobrazovaniyami zheludochno-kishechnogo trakta posle ikh radikal’nogo lecheniya [Experience of endoscopic monitoring of patients with malignant neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract after their radical treatment]. Sbornik tezisov konferentsii «Dni RONTS im. N. G. Blokhina v Samarskoy oblasti» Conference abstracts «Days of the RCRC. N. G. Blokhin in the Samara region”, 2005, pp. 163–164
      21. Scherbakov A. M., Avanesyan A. A. Endoscopic ultra- sound sonography (EUS) Problems in oncology. 2009;55(6): 679–683.
      22. Kruglova I. I. Optimizatsiya utochnyayushchey diagnostiki raka zheludka s ispol’zovaniyem endosonografii. Diss. kand. med. nauk. [Optimization of the clarifying diagnosis of stomach cancer using endosonography. Cand. Diss.] Kazan, 2009
      23. Diomidova V. N. Transabdominal’naya sonografiya v diagnostike predrakovoy i opukholevoy patologiy zheludka Diss. dokt. med. nauk. [Transabdominal sonography in the diagnosis of precancerous and tumor pathologies of the stomach. Doct. Diss.] Kazan, 2009
      24. Shavlikova L. A., Sukonko T. F. Novosti luchevoy diagnostiki [News of Beam Diagnostics] Moscow, 2001. 37–39 p.
     


    Full text is published :
    Belyaeva T.V., Ibraev M.A., Kuvshinov Yu.P., Melikhova O.A. THE ROLE OF COMPLEX ENDOSCOPIC AND ENDOSONOGRAPHIC STUDIES IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PROXIMAL GASTRIC CANCER. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2018;152(04):83-88
    Read & Download full text

    1. North-Western state medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov (St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)
    2. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University” (Novgorod, Russian Federation)
    3. St Petersburg University (St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)
    4. Institute of Toxicology of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)

    Keywords:chronic liver disease, intrahepatic cholestasis, Remaxol, viral hepatitis, metabolic hepatitis, toxic hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, hepatoprotective effect, anticholestatic action

    Abstract:Aim. To investigate the impact of infusion therapy with Remaxol® on liver function in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis in chronic liver diseases (metabolic, drug, alcoholic hepatitis, chronic hepatitis B, C, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, cross autoimmune syndrome). Subjects and methods. 102 patients aged 25 to 80 years, with intrahepatic cholestasis syndrome with chronic liver diseases different etiology were examined. Patients of the main group (n = 68) in the complex therapy received an infusion hepatoprotector Remaxol® daily intravenously drip 400.0 ml once a day for 11 days. Patients of the comparison group (n = 34) in the complex therapy received lyophilizate to prepare a solution for intravenous and intramuscular administration of ademetionine 400 mg diluted in the original solvent. Results. Infusion therapy with Remaxol® for chronic liver diseases of various etiologies (viral, metabolic, toxic, autoimmune), with intrahepatic cholestasis promotes: regression of the main clinical syndromes (pain abdominal from 68% to 25%, dyspeptic, 80% to 26% asthenic from 92% to 52% (p <0.05), cholestatic from 100% to 24% (p <0.05). A statistically significant difference in the dynamics of cholestasis was demonstrated by the change in the GGT value between the groups studied: the relative values of reduction in GGT levels in the patients of the main group were 38% compared to 19% in the comparison group patients (p <0.05). In the patients of the main group, the level of total cholesterol was reduced in dynamics from 10,10 ± 1,20 to 6,23 ± 0,31 mmol/l (p <0,001); improvement of protein-synthetic liver function; an increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes from 1.05 ± 0.08 x 109/l to 1.53 ± 0.06 x 109/l, (p <0.05). Conclusion. The effectiveness of Remaxol® in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis indicates the role of hepatoprotective, anticholestatic, cytoprotective effect of antioxidant therapy in restoring the functional status of the liver, immunoreactivity cells, as well as the presence of a lipid-regulating effect of the drug.

      1. Babak O.YA. Cholestasis syndrome: what each doctor needs to know. Ukrainskij terapevticheskij zhurnal. 2005;3:4–22
      2. Diseases of the liver and biliary tract: A guide for doctors/ pod red. V. T. Ivashkina. – 2-e izd. Moscow, OOO Izd. Dom “Vesti” Publ., 2005. P. 586
      3. Bueverov A. O. Medicinal liver damage as a cause of intrahepatic cholestasis. Klinicheskie perspektivy gastroehnterologii, gepatologii. 2005;6:2–6
      4. Golovanova E. V. Diagnostika i lechenie vnutripechenochnogo holestaza pri hronicheskih zabolevaniyah pecheni Dokt, Diss. [Diagnosis and treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis in chronic liver diseases Doct. Diss.] Moscow, 2008 236 p.
      5. Zvyaginceva T.D., CHernobaj A. I. Cholestatic diseases of the liver: modern approaches to diagnosis and treatment. Novosti mediciny i farmacii. 2006;5:25–26.
      6. Ivashkin V.T., SHirokova E.N., Maevskaya M. V., Pavlov CH.S., SHifrin O. S. Clinical recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of cholestasis. Moscow, 2013. p. 39
      7. Kan V. K. Cholestasis: new in pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Ros. zhurn. gastroehnterolog., gepatol., koloproktol. 1997;7(3):25–29
      8. Kovalenko A.L., Petrov A. Yu., Suhanov D. S., Savateeva T. N. et al. Remaxol – a preparation for the restoration of the antioxidant defense system for liver damage with cyclophosphamide in an experiment. Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya farmakologiya 2011;1:32–35
      9. Kozlov V. K. Sepsis: Etiology, immunopathogenesis, the concept of modern immunotherapy. Saint Petersburg, Dialekt. Publ. 2008. p.295
      10. Minushkin O. N. Treatment of the main manifestations of liver disease. Klinicheskaya farmakologiya i terapiya. 1996;1:4–8
      11. Nikitin I.G., Storozhakov G. I. Medicinal lesions of the liver. Diseases of the liver and biliary tract: A guide for doctors. Ed. V. T. Ivashkin. Мoscow, “М–Vesti” Publ. 2002. p.122–131
      12. Podymova S. D. Diseases of the liver M.: Medicina Publ. 2005. p.768
      13. Radchenko V.G., SHabrov A.V., Zinov'eva E. N. Diseases of the liver and bile ducts: a guide for doctors. SPb: SpecLit 2011: 241–269]
      14. Reshetnyak V. I. Mekhanizm razvitiya vnutripechenochnogo holestaza i lechenie bol'nyh pervichnym biliarnym cirrozom pecheni Dokt. Diss. [Mechanism of development of intrahepatic cholestasis and treatment of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Doct. Diss.] Moscow 1996. 280 p.
      15. Romancov M.G., Suhanov D. S., Petrov A.Yu. The use of substrates for energy metabolism in chronic liver damage for the correction of metabolic disorders (experimental and clinical studies). Fundamental. issled. 2011;3:131–142.
      16. Smirnova N.G., CHefu S.G., Kovalenko A. L., Grashin R.A The state of free radical oxidation and antioxidant protection in experimental cholestasis. Surgery. Journal of them. N. I. Pirogov. 2011;3:50–55.
      17. Sologub T. V., Goryacheva L. G., Suhanov D. S. Hepatoprotective activity of remaxol in chronic liver lesions. Klinicheskaya medicina. 2010; 1: 62–66.
      18. Sologub T. V., Goryacheva L. G., Suhanov D. S., Romancov M. G. A study of pharmacotherapeutic efficacy, safety with an assessment of the risk of adverse outcomes, the inclusion of remaxol in the therapy of chronic liver lesions. Vestn. SPbGMA im. I. I. Mechnikova. 2009;2:112–116.
      19. Ctel'mah V.V., Kozlov V. K., Radchenko V. G., Nekrasova A. S. Pathogenetic therapy of metabolic syndrome at the stage of organ damage. Klin med 2012;6:66–70
      20. Ctel'mah V.V., Radchenko V. G., Kozlov V. K. Metabolic correctors on the basis of succinic acid as a means of pathogenetic therapy for chronic viral hepatitis. Terapevticheskij arhiv. 2011;2:67–71.
      21. Stel'mah V.V., Kozlov V. K., Samusenko I. A. Morphofunctional state of resident liver macrophages in chronic viral hepatitis is the point of application of succinate-containing drugs. Medicinskij alfavit. Prakticheskaya gastroehnterologiya. 2017;40(4):62–68.
      22. Suhanov D.S., Ivanov A. K., Romancov M. G., Kovalenko A. L. Treatment of hepatotoxic complications of anti-tuberculosis therapy with succinate-containing drugs. Ros med zhurnal. 2012;6:22–25.
      23. Suhanov D.S., Petrov A.YU., Kovalenko A. L., Romancov M. G. Induction of S-adenosyl-L-methionine in hepatocytes during pharmacotherapy of toxic and medicinal liver lesions in the experiment. Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya farmakologiya. 2011;10:34–38
      24. Ushkalova E. A. Medicinal lesions of the liver. Vrach. 2007;3:22–26
      25. Shilov V. V., SHikalova I. A., Vasil'ev S. A. Features of pharmacological correction of toxic liver damage in patients with alcohol dependence and severe forms of ethanol poisoning. Zhurn nevrol i psihiatr. 2012;1:45–48
      26. Catalino F., Scarponi S., Cesa F. et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenosus S-denosyl-L–Methionine therapy in the management of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy // Drug Invest. 1992. Vol. 4. Suppl. 4. P. 78–82.
      27. Hirschfield GM, Heathcote EJ, Gershwin ME. Pathogenesis of cholestatic liver disease and therapeutic approaches. Gastroenterology 2010; 139:1481–96.
      28. Karlsen T. Schrumph E., Boberg K. M. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 24:655–666.
      29. Lammert C, Juran BD, Schlicht E, et al. Biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid predicts survival in a North American cohort of primary biliary cirrhosis patients. J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct;49(10):1414–20.
      30. Leushner M., Maier K.-M., Schlichting J. et al. Oral budesonide and ursodeoxycholic acid treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis: results of a prospective double-blind trial// Gastroenterology. – 1999. – Vol. 117. – P. 918–925.
      31. Lucena MI, Garcia-Martin E., Andrade RG, et al. Mitochondrial superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Hepatology 2010; 52:303–312.
      32. Paumgartner G, Beuers U. Mechanisms of action and therapeutic efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid in cholestatic liver disease. Clin Liver Dis. 2004 Feb;8(1):67–81
      33. Russman S., Jetter A., Kullak-Ublic G.A. Pharmacogenetics of drug-induced liver injury. Hepatology 2010; 52: 748–761.
      34. Trauner M, Fickert P, Halilbasic E, Moustafa T. Lessons from the toxic bile concept for the pathogenesis and treatment of cholestatic liver diseases. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2008; 158:542–548.
     


    Full text is published :
    Stelmakh V.V., Kovalenko A.L., Kozlov V.K. EFFICIENCY OF THE PREPARATION “REMAXOL, SOLUTION FOR INFUSIONS” IN THE THERAPY OF PATIENTS WITH THE SYNDROME OF INTRAUPECULAR CHOLESTASIS IN CHRONIC DIFFUSION DISEASES OF THE LIVER. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2018;152(04):89-98
    Read & Download full text