Submission of the manuscript is online via e-mail
ecgarticle@gmail.com or
cholerez@mail.ru

Tel: +7 903 250 5288

Editorial Correspondence e-mail
gastrossr@gmail.com


Publishing, Subscriptions, Sales and Advertising, Correspondence e-mail
journal@cniig.ru

Tel: +7 917 561 9505

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

    1. Ryazan State Medical University (Ryazan, Russian Federation)

    Keywords:Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy, choledocholithiasis, video-endoscopic techniques

    Abstract:Purpose: Improve treatment outcomes in patients with cholelithiasis complicated by choledochal-tiasa, through the introduction and improvement of the videoendoscopic technology. Materials and methods: 97 patients with cholelithiasis complicated by choledocholithiasis and/or stenosing duodenal papillitis is divided into two homogeneous groups. In the main group (n=47) of the patients operated using laparoscopy, in control (n=50) - laparotomy. Results: the Average duration of surgery in both groups were not significantly different. The level of postoperative pain in patients of the main group was significantly lower than the comparison group. Light postoperative complications observed were given in 17 cases of the main group (36.2%) and in 24 patients in the control group (48.0 per cent). In 1 patient of the main group diagnosed subhepatic abscess, developed shenny by drainage under ULTRASOUND control. 3 patients of the control group, postoperative wound suppuration. In each of the groups, there was 1 case of insolvency of choledochojejunoanastomosis. Conclusions: Laparoscopic access has no effect on the duration of operation of the radio and can significantly reduce the intensity of postoperative pain. Often, the early postoperative complications after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy-MII does not exceed the frequency of complications after choledocholithotomy performed laparoscopy-volume access.

      1. Kuznetsov Yu. N. Endosurgical technologies in the treatment of acute cholecystopancreatitis. I. P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2004; no. 1–2: pp.125–130. (In Russ)
      2. Natalskiy A. A., Tarasenko S. V., Peskov O. D. The problem of liver failure in surgery. Eruditio Juvenium. 2013; no.1, pp. 61–73.
      3. DuCoin C., Moon R., Teixeira A. Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy as an alternate treatment for common bile duct stones after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2014, vol. 10, no.4, pp. 647-652.
      4. Hawker G. et al. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale. Arthritis Care & Research, 2011, vol. 63, no.11, pp. 240-252.
      5. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P. A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg, 2004 vol. 240, no.2, pp. 205-213.
      6. El Nakeeb A., Askr W., El Hanafy E. Long term outcomes of choledochoduodenostomy for common bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopy and endoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology, 2015, vol. 62, no.137, pp 6-10.
      7. Yi, H., Hong G., Min S. Long-term outcome of primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with choledochoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2015, vol. 25, no. 3, pp 250-253.
     


    Full text is published :
    Tarasenko S. V., Zaitsev O. V., Tyulenev D. O., Kopejkin A. A., Rakhmaev T. S., Bogomolov A. Yu. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMMEDIATE RESULTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND LAPAROTOMIC OF CHOLEDOCHOLITHOTOMY. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2018;152(04):60-65
    Read & Download full text

    1. North-Western state medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov (St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)
    2. Saint-Petersburg I. I. Dzhanelidze research institute of emergency medicine (St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)

    Abstract:The article describes the range of possibilities of endobiliary interventions in the treatment of obstructive jaundice and main conditions for the successful operation on the large duodenal papilla with paraphateral diverticula. Key words: large duodenal papilla, paraphateral diverticulum, obstructive jaundice, endoscopic interventions.

      1. Bykov M. I., Porkhanov V. A. Endoscopic transpapillary lithoextraction in case of parapapillary diverticulum. Khirurgiya, 2015. – № 10. – С. 78–81
      2. Andriulli A., Loperfido S., Napolitano G., Niro G., Valvano M. R., Spirito F., Pilotto A., Forlano R. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. American Journal of gastroenterology, 2007; 102(8): 1781-1788 DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x
      3. Naoto Egawa, Hajime Anjiki, Kensuke Takuma, Terumi Kamisawa. Juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula and pancreatobiliary disease. Digestive surgery, 2010; 27:105-109. DOI: 10.1159/000286520
      4. Tyagi P., Sharma P., Sharma B.C., Puri A.S. Periampullary diverticula and technical success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun; 23(6): 1342-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0167-7
      5. Chiang T.H, Lee Y.C, Chiu H.M, Huang S.P, Lin J.T, Wang H.P. Endoscopic therapeutics for patients with cholangitis caused by the juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum. Hepatogastroenterology, 2006. Jul-Aug; 53(70): 501-5.
      6. Matthew L., Silvera M.L, Seamon M.J et al. Complications related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2009 Mar; 18(1):73-82.
      7. Nison Badalov, Scott Terner, John Baillie. The prevention, recognition and treatment of post-ERCP pancreatitis. JOP. J Pancreas (Online) 2009 Mar 9, 10(2):88-97.
      8. Boix J, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Ananos F, Domenech E, Morillas R.M, Gassull M.A. Inpact of a periampullary duodenal diverticula at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a proposed classification of periampullary duodenal diverticula. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006 Aug;16(4): 208-11.
      9. Cotton P, Leung J. ERCP The fundamentals, 2015: 50-76.
      10. Gromova I. V., Kuzovlev N. F., Urzhumtseva G. A., Grashchenko S. A., Kotovsky A. E. Endoscopic Diagnostic and Therapeutic Interventions in Periampullary Diverticula. Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2000; 5(1): P. 109–113.
      11. Varia D., Dowsett J. E., Hatfield A. R.W. et al. Is duodenal diverticulum a risk factor for sphincterotomy? Gut. 1989. V. 30. P. 939-942
      12. Expert Encyclopedia - Lower GI tract, Bile Duct and Ampullary region, 2013
      13. Balalykin A. S. Anatomy of the terminal segment of the bile duct in the application of carrying endoscopic transpapillar operations. Endoscopicheskaya khirurgiya. – 2007. – № 6. – Р. 3–9.
      14. Aminov I. H., Churkin V. V., Plotnikov E. Y., Podoluzhny V. I., Krasnov K. A., Krasnov O. A. Comparative analysis of methods of drug-induced prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Experimentalnaya i klinicheskaya gastroenterologiya [Experimental and clinical gastroenterology]. – 2012. – № 7. – P. 22–28.
      15. Khan OA, Balaji S, Branagan G. Randomized clinical trial of routine on-table cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2011; 98:3: 362–367.
     


    Full text is published :
    Kuzmin-Krutetsky M.I., Safoev M.I., Demko A.E., Ulyanov Yu.N., Levina A.S. TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF DIAGNOSTICS AND MANAGEMENT OF CHOLELITHIASIS WITH ADVERSE EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH PARAVATERIAN DIVERTICULA. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2018;152(04):66-70
    Read & Download full text