Submission of the manuscript is online via e-mail
ecgarticle@gmail.com or
cholerez@mail.ru

Tel: +7 903 250 5288

Editorial Correspondence e-mail
gastrossr@gmail.com


Publishing, Subscriptions, Sales and Advertising, Correspondence e-mail
journal@cniig.ru

Tel: +7 917 561 9505

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

    1. State Scientifi c Center of Coloproctology, 123423, Moscow, Russia, st. Salam Adil 2
    2. I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991, Moscow, Russia
    3. Gamaleya National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology, Ministry of Public Health, Moscow, Russia

    Keywords: bacteriocins, antagonistic activity, Lactobacilli, Clostridium (Clostridioides) diffi cile, C. diffi cile-associated diarrhea

    Abstract: Aim: to evaluate antagonistic properties of Lactobacilli against clinically relevant Clostridium (Clostridioides) diffi cile strains. Materials and methods: we assessed antagonistic properties of 21 Lactobacilli strains isolated from the patients’colon biotope against 31 clinically relevant C. diffi cile strains isolated from faeces of the patients with C. diffi cile-associated diarrhea by means of a double-step culturing in the combined cultivation system. Results: Lactobacilli strains isolated from the patients’colon biotope had selective antagonistic properties against C. diffi cile. Lactobacilli strains had diff erent spectrum and intensity of antagonistic activity that showed no correlation neither with species, nor with natural population size. We isolated Lactobacilli strains with high antagonistic activity (L. paracasei 101, L. gasseri 341/2, L. paracasei 340/1). We isolated bacteriocins from Lactobacilli cultures. The infl uence of bacteriocins on C. diffi cile strains correlated with antagonistic activity of Lactobacilli; bacteriocins suppressed C. diffi cile growth in dose-dependent manner. Conclusion: evaluation of Lactobacilli antagonistic activity is a prospective approach to struggle against nosocomial infection caused by resistant strains, particularly using Lactobacilli autostrains for suppression of toxigenic C. diffi cile strains growth.

      1. Osadchuk M. A., Svistunov A. A. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea in clinical practice. Current pediatrics. 2014;13(1):102–108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/ vsp.v13i1.918
      2. AFRC R. F. Probiotics in man and animals //Journal of Applied Microbiology. – 1989. – Т. 66. – № 5. – С. 365–378.
      3. Bondarenko VM1, Vorob’ev AA. Dysbacteriosis and preparations with probiotic function. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 2004 Jan-Feb;(1):84–92.
      4. Kosterina, V.V., Ryabinina, A.P., Leonov, V.V., et al. Izmeneniye srednesutochnoy gemoliticheskoy i katalaznoy aktivnosti gospital’nykh shtammov assotsiativnoy mikrobioty pod deystviyem ekzometabolitov Candida albicans v eksperimente. [Th e change in the average daily hemolytic and catalase activity of hospital strains of associative microbiota under the infl uence of Candida albicans exometabolites in the experiment]. Bulletin of the Ugra State University. 2009, no. 3 (14), pp. 58–61.
      5. Markova Yu.A., Romanenko A. S., Shafi kova T. N. Mechanisms of bacterial polyhostality Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry. 2007, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 15–23.
      6. Todorov S. D., van Reenen C. A., Dicks L. M. T. Optimization of bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus plantarum ST13BR, a strain isolated from barley beer // Th e Journal of general and applied microbiology. – 2004. – Т. 50. – № 3. – С. 149–157.
      7. Corr, S. C., Li, Y., Riedel, C. U. et al. Bacteriocin production as a mechanism for the antiinfective activity of Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118 //Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. – 2007. – Т. 104. – № 18. – С. 7617–7621.
      8. Kudlai D. G., Likhoded V. G. Bacteriocinogeny. Moscow, Medicine, 1966, 202 p.
      9. De Vuyst L., Vancanneyt M. Biodiversity and identifi cation of sourdough lactic acid bacteria //Food Microbiology. – 2007. – Т. 24. – № 2. – С. 120–127.
      10. Hertel C., Meroth C. B. Species and strain specifi c identifi cation of lactic acid bacteria in complex microfl ora // Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift . – 2003. – Т. 116. – № 11–12. – С. 517–523.
      11. Sukhina, M.A., Mikhalevskaya, V.I., Achkasov, S.I., Safi n, A. L. Antagonism of Lactobacteria against Toxigenic Clostridium diffi cile. Coloproctology. 2017, no. S3, pp82–83.
      12. Sukhina MA, Burgasova OA, Zhukhovitskiĭ VG, Iushchuk ND. Antagonistic activity of lactobacilli of the colon. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 2012 JanFeb;(1):41–9.
      13. Todorov S. D., van Reenen C. A., Dicks L. M. T. Optimization of bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus plantarum ST13BR, a strain isolated from barley beer // Th e Journal of general and applied microbiology. – 2004. – Т. 50. – № 3. – С. 149–157.
      14. Carolissen-Mackay V., Arendse G., Hastings J. W. Purifi cation of bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria: problems and pointers //International Journal of Food Microbiology. – 1997. – Т. 34. – № 1. – С. 1–16.
      15. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4 //nature. – 1970. – Т. 227. – № 5259. – С. 680.
      16. Pulchevskaya L. P., Vasiliev D. A., Zolotukhin S. N. Metodicheskiye ukazaniya k laboratorno-prakticheskim zanyatiyam po distsipline «Probiotiki» [Guidelines for laboratory and practical classes on the subject “Probiotics”]. Ulyanovsk, Ulyanovskaya State Agricultural Academy Publ, 2010, 70 P.
     


    Full text is published :
    Sukhina M. A., Shelygin Yu. A., Zhukhovitsky V. G., Frolov S. A., Kashnikov V. N., Veselov A. V., Lutsenko S. V., Chistyakova D. A. Prospects of using antagonistic activity of lactobacilli to suppress the growth of Clostridium (Clostridioides) diffi cile. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;160(12): 19–24. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-160-12-19-24
    Read & Download full text

    1. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Kazan State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, department of hospital therapy
    2. Kazan State Medical Academy — Branch Campus of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education “Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, central scientifi c research laboratory,
    3. I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991, Moscow, Russia
    4. State Autonomous Healthcare Institution “Republican Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Tatarstan”, gastroenterology department

    Keywords: infl ammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, Clostridium diffi cile, C. diffi cile

    Abstract: Aim. To evaluate the IgA, IgM and IgG to lipoteichoic acids (LPA) of Clostridium diffi cile (C. diffi cile) in infl ammatory bowel disease (IBD). Materials and Methods. We prospectively included 147 patients with IBD [92 with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 55 with Crohn’s disease (CD)] and 30 healthy volunteers. The concentration of IgA, IgM and IgG to C. diffi cile LPA in blood was determined by enzyme immunoassay method. Results. The level of IgA to LPA of C. diffi cile was higher in active IBD — 0,12 [0,06; 0,19] mkg/ml, p<0,05) and in remission (0,12 [0,07; 0,18] mkg/ml) compared with in control group — 0,009 [0,005; 0,01] mkg/ml. In active CD the studied IgA were higher than in control group (p<0,01). The level of IgM to LPA of C. diffi cile was higher in IBD exacerbation (4,75 [2,48; 7,45 mkg/ml; p<0,001), in remission (4,69 [2,65; 7,85] mkg/ml; p<0,05) than in healthy volunteers (2,4 [1,5; 4,08] mkg/ml; p<0,01). The changes in UC and CD were identical. The studied IgG was higher in active IBD (4,17 [1,34; 6,55] mkg/ml; p<0,0001) and in remission (3,39 [1,42; 5,81] mkg/ml; p<0,01) than in control group (1,0 [0,89; 1,94] mkg/ml). The changes were similar in UC and CD. The levels of studied IgA and IgG in healthcare workers among our control group was higher than in the persons not related to medicine. Conclusions. The levels IgA, IgM and IgG to C. diffi cile LPA in IBD was signifi cant increase compared with in healthy volunteers. The increase of antibodies was characteristic for active and inactive IBD.

      1. Azimi T. Th e role of bacteria in the infl ammatory bowel disease development: a narrative review / T. Azimi, M. J. Nasiri, A. S. Chirani et al. // APMIS. – 2018. – № 126(4). – Р. 275–283.
      2. Nitzan O. Clostridium diffi cile and infl ammatory bowel disease: Role in pathogenesis and implications in treatment /O. Nitzan, M. Elias // World J Gastroenterol. – 2013. – № 19(43). – Р. 7577–7585.
      3. Maharshak N. Clostridium diffi cile infection in hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease Prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis / N. Maharshak, I. Barzilay, H. Zinger et al. // Medicine. – 2018. – № 97 (5). – Р. e9772.
      4. Rezapour M. Clostridium diffi cile co-infection in infl ammatory bowel disease is associated with signifi cantly increased in-hospital mortality / M. Rezapour, A. Galoosian, B. Liu et al. // Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. – 2018. – № 30(9). – Р. 1041–1046.
      5. Ivashkin V. T., Shelygin Yu.A., Abdulganiyeva D. I. et al. Guidelines of the Russian gastroenterological association and Russian Association of Coloproctology on diagnostics and treatment of ulcerative colitis in adults. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2015;25(1):48–65. (In Russ.)
      6. Ivashkin V. T., Shelygin Yu.A., Abdulganiyeva D. I. et al. Clinical guide of russian association of gastroenterology and russian association of coloproctology on diagnostics and treatment of crohn’s disease. Koloproktologia. 2017;2(60):7–29.
      7. Sokol H. Specifi cities of the intestinal microbiota in patients with infl ammatory bowel disease and Clostridium diffi cile infection / H. Sokol, S. Jegou, C. McQuitty // Gut Microbes. – 2018. – № 9(1). – Р. 55–60.
      8. Ivashkin V. T., Yushchuk N. D., Mayev I. V., et al. Diagnostics and treatment of Clostridium diffi cile-associated disease: Guidelines of the Russian gastroenterological association. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2016;26(5):56–65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22416/1382–4376–2016–26–5–56–65
      9. Nood E. V. Asymptomatic carriage of Clostridium diffi cile among HCWs: do we disregard the doctor? / E. V. Nood, K. van Dijk, Z. Hegeman et al. // Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. – 2009. – № 30(9). – Р. 924–925.
     


    Full text is published :
    Abdulganieva D., Mukhametova D., Zinkevich O., Saphina N., Koporulina M., Odintsova A. Humoral immune response to lipoteichoic acids of Clostridium diffi cile in patients with infl ammatory bowel disease. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;160(12): 25–32. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-160-12-25-32
    Read & Download full text

    1. State Scientifi c Center of Coloproctology, 123423, Moscow, Russia, st. Salam Adil, 2

    Keywords: Antibiotic-associated diarrhea, Clostridioides diffi cile, Clostridial colitis, Clostridium perfringens, C. paraputrifi cum, C. tertium, C. novyi, Clostridioides diffi cile is an associated infection

    Abstract: Aim. Determine the etiological structure of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in Russia. Materials and methods. The study included 746 patients in inpatient treatment. 502 patients were examined at the stage of admission and discharge from the hospital, and 305 patients with the clinical picture of Clostridioides diffi cile-associated infection (CDI), among them 163 (46.6%) men and 142 (53.4%) women. The age of the patients was 48–67 years. All patients were examined luminal feces upon admission to the hospital, upon discharge from the hospital and in the case of a clinical picture of CDI. Results. Analysis of the etiological factor of clostridial infection showed that in 253 (83.2%) cases, the causative agent of antibiotic-associated diarrhea was C. diffi cile. Other types of clostridia were found in almost all CDI cases (97.7%). At the same time, C. perfringens remained the dominant type of clostridia in the same way as in patients upon admission to the clinic. The average dissemination of C. diffi cile was higher (p <0.05) compared with the value of the indicator in patients on admission and was 10 * 7 CFU / g; the titer of dissemination with other types of clostridia remained at the level of 10 * 5 CFU / g. — 10 * 7 CFU / g., Median 10 * 6 CFU / g. Analysis of the clinical picture of clostridial colitis revealed its similarity, regardless of the etiologically signifi cant microorganism being detected. In 52 (16.8%) of 305 patients, the clinical picture was due to other members of the genus Clostridium (Clostridium perfringens, C. paraputrifi cum, C. tertium, C. novyi). Also, as with CDI, diarrhea syndrome occurred in 100% of cases, hyperthermia occurred in 82%, fl atulence in 42%, vomiting in 13%, and abdominal pain in 11%. The severity of Clostridium spp. Diarrhea varied widely. So, in 26 (50%) of 52 patients with preserved anal defecation, the median stool frequency was 10 (5; 14) times / day, which is comparable with the data obtained in colitis caused by C. diffi cile. Conclusions. An analysis of the etiological factor in the development of CDI showed that, in addition to the known etiological factor of antibiotic-associated diarrhea — toxigenic C. diffi cile with the leading virulence factor production of toxin B, in 52 (16.9%) cases, other representatives of this genus were an etiological factor of diarrhea (Clostridium perfringens, C. paraputrifi cum, C. tertium, C. novyi). The development of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, caused by representatives of other types of clostridia, must be considered when prescribing therapy for clostridial colitis.

      1. Zakharenko A. A., Suvorov A. N., Shlyk I. V., et al. Disorders of a microbiocenosis of intestines at patients with a colorectal cancer and ways of their correction (review). Koloproktologia. 2016; 2(56):48–56.
      2. Sekacheva. M. I. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Consilium Medicum. Gastroenterology. 2007; 02: 39–42.
      3. Shulpenkova Yu. O. Russkij medicinskij zhurnal. 2007, vol.15, no.6, pp.1–6 (in Russian).
      4. Uspenskiy Yu.P., Fominykh Yu. A. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea: actuality of the problem, prevention and therapy. Th e Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2013;(2):46–53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20514/2226– 6704–2013–0–2–46–53
      5. Mulyar N. F., Vereschagina S. A., Fadeeva T. V., et al. Clostridium diffi cile associated diarrhea in multidisciplinary hospital. Acta biomedica scientifi ca. 2012, no. 5–1 (87), pp. 72–75.
      6. Malov V. A. Clostridium diffi cile infection: current state of the problem. Pharmateca. 2010, no.4, pp.27–31.
      7. Korneeva O. N. Rossijskij zhurnal gepatologii, gastrojenterologii i koloproktologii. 2007; 3: 65–70 (in Russian).
      8. Eichel-Streiber C. von, Warfolomeow I., Knautz D. et al. Morphological changes in adherent cells induced by Clostridium diffi cile toxins. // Biochemical Society transactions. 1991. № 4 (19). P. 1154–1160.
      9. Buonomo E.L., Petri W. A. Th e microbiota and immune response during Clostridium diffi cile infection // Anaerobe. 2016. (41). P. 79–84.
      10. Kim J., Pai H., Seo M. et al. Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Clostridium diffi cile Infection in a Korean tertiary hospital // Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2011. № 10 (26). P. 1258–1264.
      11. Lyytikäinen O., Turunen H., Sund R. et al. Hospitalizations and deaths associated with Clostridium diffi cile infection, Finland, 1996–2004. // Emerging infectious diseases. 2009. № 5 (15). P. 761–765.
      12. Kanerva M., Mentula S., Virolainen-Julkunen A. et al. Reduction in Clostridium diffi cile infections in Finland, 2008–2010. // Th e Journal of hospital infection. 2013. № 2 (83). P. 127–131.
      13. Chen Y., Glass K., Liu B. et al. Burden of Clostridium diffi cile infection: associated hospitalization in a cohort of middle-aged and older adults // American Journal of Infection Control. 2017. № 5 (45). P. 508–511.
      14. Piliyev D. V., Achkasov S. I., Korneva T. K., Sushkov O. I. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea: state-of-theart. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2014, no.5, pp. 54–61.
      15. Dubberke E.R., Butler A. M., Reske K. A. et al. Attributable outcomes of endemic Clostridium diffi cile-associated disease in nonsurgical patients. // Emerging infectious diseases. 2008. № 7 (14). P. 1031–1038.
      16. Surawicz C.M., Brandt L. J., Binion D. G. et al. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium diffi cile infections // Th e American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2013. № 4 (108). P. 478–498.
      17. Blixt T., Gradel K. O., Homann C. et al. Asymptomatic carriers contribute to nosocomial Clostridium diffi cile infection: a cohort study of 4508 patients // Gastroenterology. 2017. № 5 (152), P. 1031–1041.
      18. Planche T.D., Davies K. A., Coen P. G. et al. Diff erences in outcome according to Clostridium diffi cile testing method: a prospective multicentre diagnostic validation study of C. diffi cile infection // Th e Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2013. № 11 (13). P. 936–945.
      19. Aguado J.M., Anttila V. J., Galperine T. et al. Highlighting clinical needs in Clostridium diffi cile infection: the views of European healthcare professionals at the front line // Journal of Hospital Infection. 2015. № 2 (90). P. 117–125.
      20. Shah D.N., Aitken S. L., Barragan L. F. et al. Economic burden of primary compared with recurrent Clostridium diffi cile infection in hospitalized patients: a prospective cohort study // Journal of Hospital Infection. 2016. № 3 (93). P. 286–289.
      21. Shelygin Yu.A., Aleshkin V. A., Sukhina M. A. et al. Clinical recommendations of the national association of specialists for the healthcare-related infections control and the russian association of coloproctology on diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of clostridium diffi cile-associated diarrhea (cdi). Koloproktologia. 2018. № 3 (65). С. 7–23.
     


    Full text is published :
    Achkasov S. I., Sukhina M. A., Sushkov O. I., Frolov S. A., Kashnikov V. N., Safi n A. L., Veselov A. V., Shelygin Yu. A. Etiological structure of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in patients with large intestine diseases. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;160(12): 33–39. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31146/16828658-ecg-160-12-33-39
    Read & Download full text

    1. State Scientifi c Center of Coloproctology, 123423, Moscow, Russia, st. Salam Adil, 2
    2. Federal state budgetary educational institution additional professional education Ministry of Health of Russia, 125993, Moscow, Russia, st. Barrikadnaya, d. 2⁄1, p. 1

    Keywords: Clostridioides diffi cile, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, Clostridioides diffi cile — associated infection, antibiotic resistance, vancomycin, metronidazole, fi daxomycin

    Abstract: Aim. To study the distribution of Clostridioides diffi cile strains resistant to antibacterial drugs in patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Materials and methods. The study included 102 strains of Clostridioides diffi cile, isolated from 118 patients with a clinical picture of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Isolation and identifi cation of microorganisms was carried out by standard bacteriological methods. Results. Of the total number of isolated strains of C. diffi cile, 7.6% were resistant to vancomycin and metronidazole. 21.9% of C. diffi cile strains were resistant to metronidazole. The level of resistance to vancomycin in strains isolated from patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea, according to our data, has increased from 4% to 9.6% over the past 2 years. More than half of C. diffi cile strains (51.3%) were resistant to rifaximin. 2 strains of C. diffi cile were resistant to fi daxomycin. Conclusions. The analysis of C. diffi cile resistance to the main drugs recommended as etiotropic therapy for clostridial colitis showed that it was 9.6% for vancomycin and 21.9% for metronidazole in a Russian coloproctology hospital. The obtained data confi rm the need to monitor the spread of resistance among strains of C. diffi cile, the etiological factor of antibiotic-associated infection.

      1. Zakharenko A. A., Suvorov A. N., Shlyk I. V., et al. Disorders of a microbiocenosis of intestines at patients with a colorectal cancer and ways of their correction (review). Koloproktologia. 2016; 2(56):48–56.
      2. Sekacheva. M. I. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Consilium Medicum. Gastroenterology. 2007; 02: 39–42.
      3. Shulpenkova Yu. O. Russkij medicinskij zhurnal. 2007, vol.15, no.6, pp.1–6 (in Russian).
      4. Uspenskiy Yu.P., Fominykh Yu. A. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea: actuality of the problem, prevention and therapy. Th e Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2013;(2):46–53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20514/2226– 6704–2013–0–2–46–53
      5. Kouzegaran S., Ganjifard M., Tanha A. S. Detection, ribotyping and antimicrobial resistance properties of Clostridium diffi cile strains isolated from the cases of diarrhea. Materia socio-medica. 2016. № 5 (28). P. 324–328.
      6. Tang C., Cui L., Xu Y. et al. Th e incidence and drug resistance of Clostridium diffi cile infection in Mainland China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. // Scientifi c reports. 2016. (6). P. 1–10.
      7. Vardakas K. Z., Polyzos K. A., Patouni K. et al. Treatment failure and recurrence of Clostridium diffi cile infection following treatment with vancomycin or metronidazole: a systematic review of the evidence // International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2012. № 1 (40). P. 1–8.
      8. Reveles K. R., Lee G. C., Boyd N. K. et al. Th e rise in Clostridium diffi cile infection incidence among hospitalized adults in the United States: 2001–2010 // American Journal of Infection Control. 2014. № 10 (42). P. 1028–1032.
      9. Alicino C., Giacobbe D. R., Durando P. et al. Increasing incidence of Clostridium diffi cile infections: results from a 5-year retrospective study in a large teaching hospital in the Italian region with the oldest population. // Epidemiology and infection. 2016. № 12 (144). P. 2517–2526.
      10. O’Brien J.A., Lahue B. J., Caro J. J. et al. Th e emerging infectious challenge of Clostridium diffi cile-associated disease in Massachusetts hospitals: clinical and economic consequences // Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiology. 2007. № 11 (28). P. 1219–1227.
      11. Shah D. N., Aitken S. L., Barragan L. F. et al. Economic burden of primary compared with recurrent Clostridium diffi cile infection in hospitalized patients: a prospective cohort study // Journal of Hospital Infection. 2016. № 3 (93). P. 286–289.
      12. Hensgens M. P.M., Goorhuis A., Dekkers O. M. et al. Time interval of increased risk for Clostridium diffi cile infection aft er exposure to antibiotics. // Th e Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2012. № 3 (67). P. 742–748.
      13. Surawicz C. M., Brandt L. J., Binion D. G. et al. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium diffi cile infections // Th e American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2013. № 4 (108). P. 478–498.
      14. Kyne L., Merry C., O’Connell B. et al. Factors associated with prolonged symptoms and severe disease due to Clostridium diffi cile // Age and Ageing. 1999. № 2 (28). P. 107–113.
      15. Eiland E. H., Sawyer A. J., Massie N. L. et al. Fidaxomicin use and clinical outcomes for Clostridium diffi cile-associated diarrhea. // Infectious diseases in clinical practice (Baltimore, Md.). 2015. № 1 (23). P. 32–35.
      16. Huang J. S., Jiang Z. D., Garey K. W. et al. Use of rifamycin drugs and development of infection by rifamycin-resistant strains of Clostridium diffi cile. // Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2013. № 6 (57). P. 2690–2693.
      17. Krutova M., Matejkova J., Tkadlec J. et al. Antibiotic profi ling of Clostridium diffi cile ribotype 176A multidrug resistant relative to C. diffi cile ribotype 027. // Anaerobe. 2015. (36). P. 88–90.
      18. Shelygin Yu.A., Aleshkin V. A., Sukhina M. A. et al. Clinical recommendations of the national association of specialists for the healthcare-related infections control and the russian association of coloproctology on diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of clostridium diffi cile-associated diarrhea (cdi). Koloproktologia. 2018. № 3 (65). С. 7–23.
      19. Mellado E., Garcia-Eff ron G., Alcazar-Fuoli L., et al. A new Aspergillus fumigatus resistance mechanism conferring in vitro cross-resistance to azole antifungals involves a combination of cyp51a alterations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007; 51:1897–1904
      20. Kozlov R. S., Sukhorukova M. V., Eidelstein M. V., et al. Clinical guidelines. Determination of the sensitivity of microorganisms to antimicrobial agents
      21. Mayansky A. N., Chebotar I. V. Staphylococcal biofi lms: structure, regulation, rejection. Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology. 2011, no.1, pp.101–108.
      22. Pikunov D. Yu., Golovenko OV, Rybakov E. G. Pseudomembranous colitis (literature review). Coloproctology. 2010, no. 2 (32), pp. 55–60.
     


    Full text is published :
    Sukhina M. A., Shelygin Yu. A., Frolov S. A., Safin A. L. The spread of antibiotic-resistant strains of Clostridioides diffi cile in patients with antibiotic- associated diarrhea. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;160(12): 40–46. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-160-12-40-46
    Read & Download full text

    1. State Scientifi c Center of Coloproctology, 123423, Moscow, Russia, st. Salam Adil, 2
    2. Federal state budgetary educational institution additional professional education Ministry of Health of Russia, 125993, Moscow, Russia, st. Barrikadnaya, d. 2⁄1, p. 1

    Keywords: Clostridium (Clostridioides) diffi cile, lactobacilli, transplantation of intestinal microbiota

    Abstract: AAim: to imply a method of Clostridium (Clostridioides) diffi cile-associated infection treatment based on lactobacilli autostrains. Materials and methods: Toxin-producing vancomycin-resistant C. diffi cile and three types of lactobacilli in diff erent titers were isolated from the translucent feces of a patient with recurrent C. diffi cile-associated infection. According to the results of the study, the strain Lactobacillus zeae was detected, which showed high antagonistic activity against C. diffi cile. Within 48 hours, biomass of L. zeae was accumulated. The patient was administered a suspension of lactobacilli per rectum (in the form of microclysters) every other day. Results: in a patient with severe pseudomembranous colitis, a persistent remission of the underlying disease was achieved against the background of regular injections of a suspension of Lactobacillus zeae autostrains with a high antagonistic activity against C. diffi cile, isolated in this patient. Conclusion: Lactobacillus transplantation is an eff ective and promising treatment for recurrent clostridial infection resistant to antibiotic therapy.

      1. Dubberke ER, Carling P, Carrico R, et al. Strategies to prevent Clostridium diffi cile infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. // Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. – 2014. – 35 (Suppl 2). – C. S48–65.
      2. Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium diffi cile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA) // Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. – 2010. – 31. – 5. – C. 431–455.
      3. Lessa FC, Mu Y, Bamberg WM, et al. Burden of Clostridium diffi cile infection in the United States. // N Engl J Med. – 2015. – 372. – 9. – C. 825–834.
      4. Dubberke ER, Olsen MA. Burden of Clostridium diffi cile on the healthcare system. // Clin Infect Dis. – 2012. – 55 (Suppl 2). – C. S88–S92.
      5. Desai K, Gupta SB, Dubberke ER, Prabhu VS, Browne C, Mast TC. Epidemiological and economic burden of Clostridium diffi cile in the United States: estimates from a modeling approach. // BMC Infect Dis. – 2016. – 16. – C. 303.
      6. Ganc AJ, Ganc RL, Reimão SM, et al. Transplante de microbiota fecal por enteroscopia alta para o tratamento da diarreia causada por Clostridium diffi cile. // Einstein. – 2015. – 13. – 2. – C. 338–9.
      7. Rossen NG, MacDonald JK, de Vries EM, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation as novel therapy in gastroenterology: a systematic review. // World J Gastroenterol. – 2015. – 21. – 17. – C. 5359–71.
      8. Gough E, Shaikh H, Manges AR. Systematic review of intestinal microbiota transplantation (fecal bacteriotherapy) for recurrent Clostridium diffi cile infection. // Clin Infect Dis. – 2011. – 53. – 10. – C. 994–1002.
      9. Sukhina M. A., Burgasova O. A., Zhukhovitsky V. G., Yuschuk N. D. Antagonistic activity of lactobacilli of the colon. Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology. 2012, no.1, pp. 41–49.
     


    Full text is published :
    Belous S. S., Sukhina M. A., Halif I. L., Kashnikov V. N., Veselov A. V., Shelygin Yu. A. The first experience of successful treatment of pseudomembranous colitis with lactobacilli auto-strains. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;160(12): 47–50. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-160-12-47-50
    Read & Download full text

    1. State Scientifi c Center of Coloproctology, 123423, Moscow, Russia, st. Salam Adil, 2
    2. Federal state budgetary educational institution additional professional education Ministry of Health of Russia, 125993, Moscow, Russia, st. Barrikadnaya, d. 2⁄1, p. 1

    Keywords: Clostridioides diffi cile, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, fecal microbiota, Clostridioides diffi cile-associated infection

    Abstract: Aim. Study of the dynamics of changes in the intestinal microbiota of patients with Clostridioides diffi cile-associated infection. Materials and methods. The study included 746 patients in inpatient treatment. 502 patients were examined at the stage of admission and discharge from the hospital, and 305 patients with the clinical picture of Clostridioides diffi cile-associated infection (CDI), among them 163 (46.6%) men and 142 (53.4%) women. The age of the patients was 48–67 years. The qualitative and quantitative composition of translucent feces was investigated. Results. Analysis of the study of the qualitative and quantitative composition of the fecal microbiota of patients treated in a coloproctology hospital and patients with a clinical picture of Clostridioides diffi cile-associated infection showed the dynamics of changes in the colonic microbiota in patients upon admission to hospital and the development of the clinical picture of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Upon admission to the hospital, patients with diseases of the colon showed a decrease in the titer of lactobacilli (median 10 * 5 CFU / g., Fluctuation range 10 * 4 CFU / g; 10 * 6 CFU / g). With colitis caused by Clostridioides diffi cile and other members of the genus Clostridium spp., A signifi cant decrease in the amount of lactobacillus in the luminal feces was observed (p <0.01). There were no signifi cant diff erences in the level of contamination of the luminal feces with enterobacteria in all groups of patients examined. Conclusions. Development of CDI is characterized by a pronounced decrease auhtonnoy microfl ora, especially lactobacilli. The degree of microbiota changes in patients with CDI is ambiguous for each member of the microbial community of colonic microbiocenosis.

      1. Larson H.E., Parry J. V, Price A. B. et al. Undescribed toxin in pseudomembranous colitis. // BMJ. 1977. № 6071 (1). P 1246–1248.
      2. Hensgens M.P.M., Goorhuis A., Dekkers O. M. et al. Time interval of increased risk for Clostridium diffi cile infection aft er exposure to antibiotics. // Th e Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2012. № 3 (67). P. 742–748.
      3. Buonomo E.L., Petri W. A. Th e microbiota and immune response during Clostridium diffi cile infection // Anaerobe. 2016. (41). P. 79–84.
      4. Dave M., Purohit T., Razonable R. et al. Opportunistic infections due to infl ammatory bowel disease therapy // Infl ammatory Bowel Diseases. 2014. № 1 (20). P. 196–212.
      5. Piliyev D. V., Achkasov S. I., Korneva T. K., Sushkov O. I. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea: state-of-the-art. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2014, no.5, pp. 54–61.
      6. MacLaren R., Reynolds P. M., Allen R. R. et al. Histamine-2 receptor antagonists vs proton pump Inhibitors on gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage and infectious complications in the intensive care unit // JAMA Internal Medicine. 2014. № 4 (174). P. 564–574.
      7. Huang H., Wu S., Chen R. et al. Risk factors of Clostridium diffi cile infections among patients in a university hospital in Shanghai, China // Anaerobe. 2014. (30). P. 65–69.
      8. Kato H., Kita H., Karasawa T. et al. Colonisation and transmission of Clostridium diffi cile in healthy individuals examined by PCR ribotyping and pulsed-fi eld gel electrophoresis. // Journal of medical microbiology. 2001. № 8 (50). P. 720–727.
      9. Perdigon G., Alvarez S. Probiotics and the immune state // Probiotics. Chapman and Hall / Ed. by R. Fuller. – London, 2003. – Р. 146–176.
      10. Perdigon G., Vintini E., Alvarez S. et al. Study of the possible mechanisms involved in the mucosal immune system activation by lactic acid bacteria // J. Dairy Sci. – 1999. – Vol. 82. – P. 1108–1114
      11. Shelygin Yu.A., Aleshkin V. A., Sukhina M. A. et al. Clinical recommendations of the national association of specialists for the healthcare-related infections control and the russian association of coloproctology on diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of clostridium diffi cile-associated diarrhea (cdi). Koloproktologia. 2018. № 3 (65). С. 7–23.
      12. Clements A.C., Magalhães R. J.S., Tatem A. J. et al. Clostridium diffi cile PCR ribotype 027: assessing the risks of further worldwide spread // Th e Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2010. № 6 (10). P. 395–404.
      13. Freeman J., Vernon J., Morris K. et al. Pan-European longitudinal surveillance of antibiotic resistance among prevalent Clostridium diffi cile ribotypes. // Clinical microbiology and infection: the offi cial publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2015. № 3 (21). P. 248–256.
      14. Guo S., Yan W., McDonough S.P. et al. Th e recombinant Lactococcus lactis oral vaccine induces protection against C. diffi cile spore challenge in a mouse model // Vaccine. 2015. № 13 (33). P. 1586–1595.
      15. Rätsep M., Kõljalg S., Sepp E. et al. A combination of the probiotic and prebiotic product can prevent the germination of Clostridium diffi cile spores and infection // Anaerobe. 2017. (47). P. 94–103.
      16. Surawicz C.M., Brandt L. J., Binion D. G. et al. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium diffi cile infections // Th e American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2013. № 4 (108). P. 478–498.
     


    Full text is published :
    Sukhina M. A., Shelygin Yu. A., Lyagina I. A., Frolov S. A. Features of fecal microbiotes of Clostridioides diffi cile-associated infection. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;160(12): 51–57. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-160-12-51-57
    Read & Download full text